• UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    11 hours ago

    If you generate the power where it is used without pollution, we should.

    Generators take space, require maintenance, and have a certain optimal capacity that isn’t necessarily hit on a given roof.

    For wind energy in particular, the bigger the turbine, the more yield per $ spent. If you go out to Corpus Christi you’ll see these enormous turbines - $10M to $50M / ea - that generate on the order of $24 to $75 per MWh, or $.024-.075/kWh. Home wind/solar don’t get anywhere close to that.

    Prime placement of units, distribution across a wide area, and a degree of storage capacity means you’re going to get better and more consistent yield.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      But people will always be interested in generating their own, just like we don’t use communal bath houses, or community heating, or unfortunately mass transit. Yes, group services can be a lot more efficient and more reliable but they’re also out of your control and become an ongoing cost