• btaf45@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    By putting the solar panel at a 90 degree angle though it is much less efficient than e.g. a 45 degree angle.

      • cjk@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Wrong question. The right question is: is the solar panel able to be CO2 neutral (at least) or CO2 negative. We don’t get anything out of it if producing the solar panel costs more CO2 emissions than it saves by producing electricity.

        Before you ask: I don’t know the answer. I was looking into this thread in hope to find it.

        • GaMEChld@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Most people don’t care about being CO2 neutral. The real question is what is the ROI? Will the panel save that person money. If it takes 50 years to pay for itself, I’d say that’s bad. 10 years is more standard. 5 years I say it’s a no brainer. Though I suppose you can also argue value for utility, if that is giving her the ability to power something off grid that would be worth something.

          • Krik@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            54 minutes ago

            In Germany those panels usually pay themselves after about 5 years depending on the price of the necessary electronics (don’t forget the electricity meter!) and if there’s also a battery.

      • btaf45@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I hung a solar panel vertically on my fence one time. It was facing west rather than south, but I was only getting about 3-4 watts on my 100 watt panel under the best conditions.