• multiplewolves@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I was curious why someone downvoted you, so I took a look at the video.

    That is absolutely 100% CGI and I’m not sure why anyone is doubting that. I’m on mobile and I can still see it.

    Take my upvote.

    • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      The biggest tell is at 0:21.

      You see the badge flying around as a physics object and then, when the animation stops the left side part of the necklace “resets” and slides up on the bots neck despite that being like a ball suddenly deciding to go from a rest to rolling up hill.

      It looks like it went from being rendered as a physics object to slowing down enough that it returned to being a regular object attached to the model’s rigging .

      • multiplewolves@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        The badge, the soft landings, and the seams in the concrete blipping in and out were the biggest factors for me.

        Edit for downvoter: Watch nothing but the concrete for the whole video. I think the badge moved too perfectly and the landings didn’t seem to reflect physics, but the jitter on the concrete rendering is beyond unrealistic.