• RobotToaster@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s sad, I remember when bitcoin was new and the people interested were actually interested in breaking the state control of money. Now >99% of crypto people are just grifters and people trying to get rich quick.

      • bermuda@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        bitcoin skyrocketed and suckered in a lot of people to the gold rush. they didn’t want decentralized currency or anything. They just saw that it was ~16,000 dollars a bitcoin and wanted in.

      • anachronist@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Most people were grifters back then too. I had a friend who was a libertarian porcfest free-stater and he was against bitcoin because he was afraid everyone would lose all their money and not be able to complete the free state project.

    • jarfil@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Shitcoins and GIF NFTs are complete scams, nothing to argue there.

      Also Papal Indulgences, stamp collections, carbon offsets, the USD… we can go on 🤷

      • Uncle_Bagel@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        If the price of rare stamps craters you can always just use the stamp to mail a letter to your friend. They are onysical items with actual scarcity and legit demand from collectors. Loads of people have collected stamps, coins, and baseball cards for decades and even centuries

        • jarfil@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Rare stamps collections include stamps from countries that no longer exist, are no longer valid, or are only commemorative and were never valid in the first place. Same thing for coins and banknotes, some you can only use to look at them.

          They’re items with scarcity… that is no always all that scarce, and there are a lot of scams going around. Some are fake, some are so good of a fake that are unique and valuable again… 🤷

          (but… “use the stamp to mail a letter”? What century is this? 😉)

          • Uncle_Bagel@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I send a check to my trash service because they want to charge a fee for me to pay online. That requires a stamp, and my mom sends me card a every few months despite us texting regularly.

    • ComradeKhoumrag@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would argue 99.99% of crypto and nfts are complete scams. But Blockchain is a change in how we manage and distribute data, and can remove centralization of power from humans that we would otherwise need to trust for managing autonomous systems like the data in a banks public ledger.

      • GunnarRunnar@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Could you describe a case example how that applies in practice?

        Because yeah I understand that when we all have our own copy of the data someone can’t falsify all our independent copies but is data being tampered like that even the problem?

        • cassetti@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I personally envision a future where we use blockchain technology to create a new direct democracy party in which every member has a unique identifier and the blockchain ledger system used to track polling data. Every individual member of the party would have one vote in each poll at ever level (federal, state, regional, etc) - for every single thing that gets a vote, and the elected politician representing that party would be required to vote based on the polling data.

          Everyone would have access to a copy of the ledger to confirm their votes are counted accurately, and they can review polling data to confirm their elected politicians are voting based on polling data, and the representative would be replaced if they do not adhere to the results

          • jarfil@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Why a party? You don’t need a party for direct democracy, just 1 person = 1 vote. Either vote yourself, or authorize someone you trust to vote in your name, be it for a time, or on a certain topic, or whatever, if you’re too busy to vote on every poll.

            • cassetti@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’d love to see that happen, But it’s because America won’t switch to a direct democracy. Instead we have a Kleptocracy run by corporations and the 1% who have power over both parties in America. However if it were possible to create a third political party where every member of the party earns only one vote maybe it would give people power back over corporations. But it’s a pipe dream, I know it’ll never happen.

              • jarfil@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                The problem I see with it being a third “political party”, is that it would still have to get past the gerrymandering, the FPTP, and the general issue of financing.

                In representative democracies, that “representative” part is so often set up with extra hoops in a way that counters any attempt at direct democracy. It’s… a curious coincidence.

    • Euphoma@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Cryptocurrency has its uses as unregulated currency, though that makes it easy to scam people with it.

      • upstream@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The biggest problem is people trying to peddle it as currency.

        It isn’t currency, never will be. Much more alike to bonds.

        It’s an investment object with a speculative value, and no tangible value. The only value it has is what the next guy is willing to pay for it.

        While currency is deflationary by nature, crypto is entirely based on demand and supply, and sure, as long as people think it will be worth more tomorrow - sky’s the limit.

        Like any pyramid scheme it pays out to get in early, and get out before it collapses.

        Relying on crypto is high stakes gambling, and people being people is the only reason I can find for it not having collapsed totally already.

        • Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The problem with using it as either a gamble or an investment is that the person/people holding control over the currency are doing so with the intent to make money. More often than not your money is gone the instant you pay in if they decide to make it hard/impossible to cash out. This is what Logan Paul’s scam crypto ended up doing. Say what you will about the US dollar, their main incentive is to stay in power which backs up the legitimacy of the currency. They’re not just going to rugpull the dollar because it would run counter to that goal.

          It’s fundamentally impossible for crypto to fulfil that role because everyone involved is just there to make a quick buck.

        • ConsciousCode@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It’s fiat, I won’t argue it was ever going to be a good currency with built-in deflation, but that’s what it was originally meant to be. It’s long since become too volatile to be anything but a speculative asset, though. It does seem curious to me what that says about the actual distinction between legitimate currencies, stock options, and pyramid scheme buy-ins.

          • jarfil@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            High volatility is not a problem for a currency:

            • work January, get paid $1000, pay $1000 in due bills
            • work February, get paid $25000, pay $25000 in due bills
            • work March, get paid $50, pay $50 in due bills

            Volatility is irrelevant to a currency, unless you want to treat it as an investment.

            • Sas [she/her]@beehaw.org
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago
              • work January, get paid 1000, pay 600 in bills and lay 400 aside for potential emergencies
              • work February, medical emergency comes up but medical bills now cost 10000 so you can’t afford them with the 400 you set aside and you also can’t work because of the emergency so you take 20000 debth to repay the medical cost and other bills
              • work March to repay your debth, but you only get 50 while still having a debth of 20000
              • jarfil@beehaw.org
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Volatility is irrelevant to a currency, unless you want to treat it as an investment.

                can’t afford them with the 400 you set aside

                Meaning, you treated currency as an investment. What did I just say?

                • Sas [she/her]@beehaw.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  What you just said was a thing that you can only do in an idealised world where you never get sick and all your bills are always payed in the month you get them. Nice of you to completely ignore the rest of the answer that kind of points to why in the real world you have to set aside money and why in the real world a volatile currency is useless

                  • jarfil@beehaw.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    I’m sick all the time, that’s why in my “idealized world”…

                    I just came from the pharmacy with a bag of meds, paid with… we have these plastic cards stamped with “Social Security” and our ID on them, worked just fine… right after going to get an echocardiogram… where I made the mistake of asking the receptionist where to go, he just told me to scan the barcode at this machine at the entrance, which directed me where to go and spit out a turn slip (turn 1, oh well, they didn’t seem to have many echocardiograms scheduled today)… and then had to take the bus, there is this other plastic ID card I have to touch to the scanner on entry, good thing it’s a city bus so disabled people get to ride for free.

                    By the way, also got my disability check today, which went straight to bills, and a bit onto a prepaid card in case I must pay something unexpected without having to ask a social worker for help. Setting some aside would be fun, I have some ways to invest it in case some month there’s too much left.

                    Guess I forgot to mention I live in the 1st world… but honestly, if I lived anywhere else, I’d trust currency even less.

                    (PS, the metamizole seems to be kicking in, so time to go take out the trash before I’m stuck back in bed)