I’ve generally been against giving AI works copyright, but this article presented what I felt were compelling arguments for why I might be wrong. What do you think?

    • FlowVoid@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      In a work for hire contract, the contract explicitly states that the employer gets the copyright.

      You can think of the compensation as being partly from employment, and partly from the sale of any copyright.

    • frog 🐸@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The writing is still copyrighted to the writers, not to you, unless the contract states otherwise. Same as with the wedding photo example described in other comments.