This will take place ~24 hours from now. Feel free to post and upvote questions beforehand in this post, as it will turn into the AMA tomorrow.

TimeZone Converter Link

This is a chance for any users, admins, or developers to ask anything they’d like to myself, @[email protected] , SleeplessOne , or @[email protected] about Lemmy, its future, and wider issues about the social media landscape today.

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    So many apps die before getting any users. For Lemmy however, when was the first time you really thought “Damn, this thing really might actually take off”?

    • Dessalines@lemmy.mlOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      For me it was long before the reddit migration (which was ~7 months or so ago). I noticed lemmy slowly but surely gaining traction. It felt more dead than it does now, but the trend was slow and steady growth, which is always a great sign. People were using lemmy, liking it, and sticking around.

      At the same time, it was clear that we weren’t making the mistake of all the other reddit alternatives, by promising to be a free speech haven for bigoted communities. Those people actively did our work for us by warning their communities to stay away from Lemmy and its tankie devs, thereby making Lemmy a much more enjoyable place from the very beginning. That was a crucial test: we were not willing to sacrifice our values for growth’s sake.

      It’s great to see that positivity confirmed by a researcher who did a qualitative and quantitative analysis about Lemmy migration, and finding that >90% of people saw themselves using Lemmy in the long term. We can all be very proud of that, and it means we have a bright future.

    • nutomic@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 months ago

      Lemmy was meant to be a Reddit replacement from the beginning, so it was always supposed to take off. Even in the early days the tech was working quite smoothly and users were happy so there was no real doubt about it. The only thing missing were more users. However I had no idea how a real migration would actually look like, so it was really overwhelming when last year people started to flood in and everything got overloaded and broke down.

  • GravitySpoiled@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Is there a public roadmap of some sort?

    Maybe a blog post like “a year in review and what’s up for this year”

    I’m not talking about bugs or minor tweaks. Just a general where are we, where are we coming from and where are we going to? What are important milestones?

    • Dessalines@lemmy.mlOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’ve just updated the post body with some updates about this, but if we get approved for another year of funding from NLNet, the the two new devs will be working on these milestones in 2024 (still a draft at this point).

      Being an open source project, we can afford to be less strict about a roadmap, as anyone (including ourselves) can take on any of the open issues on the issue tracker. Part of the fun of these is getting to pick which things you’d like to work on, and that you personally think are important.

      Outside of maintenance-related tasks and merging PRs (which does take a significant chunk of our time) of course @[email protected] and I both have things we’d like to prioritize this year. My main priorities are:

      • Getting Jerboa as fully functional as lemmy-ui.
      • Notifications (Unified push).
      • Working on lemmy-ui-leptos, our proposed replacement web UI for lemmy-ui written in Rust.
      • Performance improvements (DB, federation code)
      • Stabilizing the API
      • Becoming fully funded by donations, and growing our dev co-op.
    • aeharding@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think a lemmy roadmap for the next year is hard, because scope and even individual features depend on funding (for example, nlnet funds specific features).

      Maybe something like Mastodon’s roadmap would be possible though (with no specific timeline)? https://joinmastodon.org/roadmap

      • Steve@communick.news
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I wouldn’t put a timeline to it. Just a list of features, broad and specific. As time goes on, they can be marked as “in progress” or “included”. New things can be added over time, or made more specific. All without timetables. For now call it a wishlist.

    • Blaze@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The AMA is upcoming on Friday, it’s not this thread

      Edit: Leaving this here

      • sunaurus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s OK to post questions here:

        Feel free to post and upvote questions beforehand in this post, as it will turn into the AMA tomorrow.

  • sunaurus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Do you think Lemmy is decentralized enough right now, or are you worried about some of the bigger instances growing too much?

    • Dessalines@lemmy.mlOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Its definitely a concern. IMO the lemmyverse is far too centralized at the moment. The big questions are:

      1. Is there a trend toward centralization, or away from it?
      2. How are people being introduced / onboarded onto lemmy?
      3. What can we do to combat centralization?

      (1) I’m honestly unsure, and I’d def appreciate if anyone has done a study of it. We’ve seen a big growth in single person / smaller topic-focused instances, which is a great thing, but if their communities aren’t growing, we need to figure out how to reverse that trend. I’d have no problem with the current large instances, including this one, as long as the long-term-trend is away from them.

      (2) Is mostly word-of-mouth, join-lemmy.org, and apps / web-ui’s which show an instance by default.

      We’ve made the sort for the join-lemmy.org instances page be by random active users, and tried to emphasize on that page that it doesn’t matter which instance you join, since most federate, and can subscribe / connect to any community. I hope that helps, and we need to replicate that wherever we can.

      Apps and webUI’s mostly just show lemmy.world rn, where they should show random instances. I’m guilty of this in Jerboa as well (showing lemmy.ml by default), and I’ve just opened up an issue that it should be showing a random server for anonymous users.

      But I think we need to do more, and I’d def appreciate yours and anyone else’s ideas on how we can combat centralization. We need to get ahead of this problem before it gets worse.

      • Ademir@lemmy.eco.br
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        But I think we need to do more, and I’d def appreciate yours and anyone else’s ideas on how we can combat centralization.

        I am admin of the biggest Brazilian instance, but I am welcoming more local instances and talking to the admins we should spread the load. But what I notice is the users are concerned they will miss out if they are not in an instance that already have everything.

        Could we have an easier way to auto-federate every new communities from a given instance? Even an “auto-federate everything possible” option. as @[email protected] said lemmy DB isn’t too big, most instance owners could have it on their servers. And making it opt-in won’t hurt the small instances.

        • Dessalines@lemmy.mlOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Maybe not auto-federate / auto-subscribe, but we do have an issue to federate a lightweight list of communities among servers, that could help with this.

          Its true that the disk space required isn’t too big a deal, but it would unecessarily increase the CPU and network requests by auto-federating the entire lemmyverse, rather than using explicit subscribes.

        • nutomic@lemmy.mlM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          It would be relatively easy to write a script/bot which fetches the list of communities from a given instance, and then subscribes to all of them from another instance. In fact I heard something like this already exists, but dont know the name.

          • CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            I think it’s worth bringing a solution in house. A recommended migration route. If you want people to feel confident to pick any instance, you have to give them the confidence to move easily and not fear picking a small instance that might die when their owner gets bored. A simple setting option to migrate from, then you select the account and either (through communities accessible, or through automated request, pull that data and subscribe to communities. Maybe blocks etc also.

      • OnlyTakesLs@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        Maybe hide the big instances behind a few clicks? Like you could sort/filter for them, but you’d have to navigate a bit? The average user isn’t going to bother. Like have a default sort that hides the big ones, and a default filter that filters out the top five or whatever.

    • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      The big instances are bad enough but big communities are absolute killer of decentralisation

      When you go to /c/books on your server, you don’t see an agglomeration of all /c/books on all servers of the fediverse. You only see that server’s /c/books, if it even has one.

      This is a fatal flaw of lemmy which concentrates power enormously into the hands of the owners.

      The default view should be all /c/books on all federated servers, with an easy way to filter only local posts.

      Lemmy will turn into reddit if this is not quickly rectified.

      • sunaurus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I kind of get where you’re coming from, but to me it sounds like you’re looking for a different experience than what Lemmy is designed for. It seems you are more interested in aggergating all posts about specific topics (like “books”), and strongly limiting the effect of moderation (as nobody would have final say about how to moderate an entire topic). If I correctly understood the experience you’re interested in, then for sure the design of Lemmy will not match that.

        I don’t think it’s fair to describe this as a fatal flaw, though. Lemmy is not built around the idea of generic, “ownerless” topics, instead, it’s built around communities with clear owners. We have decentralization at the admin and infrastructure level (as in, a single admin does not control the entire network), but this does not really mean we also need to have it at individual community level.

        IMO it’s totally fine that different people create different communities with extremely similar purposes. The entire internet as a whole also works like this - the internet itself is decentralized, but at the same time people can create different websites with very similar purposes (and even domains!), and it works out fine. For example, it’s totally possible for there to exist a news.com, news.co.uk, news.ee, news.fi, etc. Imagine if whenever you navigated to news.fi with your browser, it would also automatically insert content from all the other news websites of all possible domains - it doesn’t really seem like a useful feature, but that’s kind of analogous to what you’re suggesting for Lemmy at the moment.

      • Blaze@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        When you go to /c/books on your server, you don’t see an agglomeration of all /c/books on all servers of the fediverse. You only see that server’s /c/books, if it even has one.

        What prevents from visiting /c/books@anotherserver?

        Genuinely asking, because this is one of the core concepts of Lemmy and federation

        • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 months ago

          This isn’t the first time I have proposed this, but the pushback leads me to believe the owners do not want to relinquish power to the users. Lemmy it seems, is a community for owners. The interests of instance owners and their delegates come first.

          I think we will need the digg & reddit story to play out all over again so that in 10-15 years the next exodus out of lemmy might lead us somewhere we can actually be free.

            • interdimensionalmeme@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              That ends up like the multireddit suggestion. You might have a modded view of the lemmyverse where can see the obscure posts on 10 user instances.

              But most of the lemmy population will still have the default view.

              So in effect, these post are not visible to most users and they don’t becone culturally relevant. It is like they don’t exist and the only community is the “big one” plus maybe a 2nd one with only the refuse from the 1st.

    • nutomic@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think its totally normal that instance sizes follow a power law distribution. Its similar to many other things, for example there are few large cities, some medium cities and lots of small cities. The wiki article lists many other examples. So I think its fine as long as there are no intentional attempts to lock in users into large instances or limit federation.

  • hendrik@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Have you put measures into place to assure the quality of future updates? In the past several updates have caused issues. And recently 0.19.x broke federation for the most of us. And it took weeks to fix it and make Lemmy usable again.

    • nutomic@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      We publish multiple release candidates and run them on lemmy.ml before the final release. That allows the community to test changes. We dont have a quality assurance team, and developers are notoriously bad at testing their own code, so I dont see what we can improve in this regard.

      • hendrik@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        developers are notoriously bad at testing their own code, so I dont see what we can improve in this regard.

        Sounds like software development… I mean automated tests help. But you’re developing a distributed/federated platform. Unit tests won’t do it. Maybe infrastructure that spins up a small fleet of instances and checks their ability to federate posts, delete comments and simulates interaction. That’d assure the most important aspects keep working. And I think there are tools for that available. But I get it. It’s complicated, there are real-world instances with special (niche) setups, you’re constrained, it has to be worth the effort and there are other important things to do.

        Maybe just do your best not to break too many things and we (users) can complain and have another discussion only if it’s a reoccurring problem. 😉

        • nutomic@lemmy.mlM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          We have lots of unit tests, and also a test suite which launches a couple of local lemmy instances and ensures that they federate as expected. But it’s not possible to cover every single functionality, at least not with our limited resources. The problems all happened with things that are difficult to test and had major breaking changes in this release. In the future we won’t need such breaking changes so there will be less problems.

          Also keep in mind that Lemmy is provided for free and as is. We have no legal obligation to users. And you can always stay with an older version if you want more stability.

          • hendrik@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            Thank you very much for explaining, and the whole AMA.

            Concerning the “providing the project for free”… I think that’s too simplistic. I mean users have expectations anyways. And you must have some motivation to maintain an open source project. Otherwise you wouldn’t put it out there, engage with your users, fix their issues and incorporate their requests. Or you’d make that clear in the first line of the Readme as some people do.

            I think open source is giving and taking. It’s not about legal obligations (we usually waive every responsibility in every open source license.) But perhaps ethically. I as a user feel obligated to honor and respect your work and the time you’ve put in. And I shouldn’t expect anything except for everyone abides by the license. But the devs aren’t the only one putting in time and effort. Downstream are admins who run the actual instances. There might be an ethical obligation to not waste their time either. And there are moderators and users who make the platform become alive. They also offer their time for free and are part of the ecosystem, like the developers are. And ethically it is correct to treat people nice who put in a few hours to prepare a proper pull request and work towards the same goal as core developers.

            And there are a few unique circumstances. This is a social network/link aggregator. And as such it relies to some degree on the network effect. It won’t work without a certain amount of users and them being happy here. Lemmy devs seem (to me) invested in the project and not just coding something for money. So you want it to be successful and catering for users is part of the equation. Additionally the users of a social network trust the platform with their private data. You can’t take legal responsibility for that. But if you accept users doing that, it’s at least an ethical obligation to make good choices.

            And the situation is: Since you have a few full-time developers… It’s not a hobby project anymore. So it’s a bit more complicated. And money might come with expectations. I personally differentiate between donations that are meant as a bounty, this money comes with obligations. And donations for the great work you’ve done so far. These come without.

            I think you’re doing a good job. I especially like that Lemmy development doesn’t seem to be focused on growth above all. You could implement things differently and completely focus on not showing user-facing issues, in order to assure fast growth. Or write a Reddit clone like some people would like, including gamification, awards and stuff. But you don’t seem to be interested in that. And that aligns well with what I like. I want a nice place to engage with people. I don’t need another platform that is commercial and does things in order to be successful at the market.

            I’m grateful. There are still bugs and a few more complicated annoyances I’d like to see being addressed. But I really enjoy spending some of my time here.

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Not a question, just wanted to let you know I how much we appreciate and love you all for making Lemmy happen 🥰🥰

  • 9point6@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Firstly, thank you so much for providing the means for me to cut Reddit out of my life, I feel like I’m engaging with content in a much more deliberate way since, and honestly it’s been a massive improvement to my mental health in a way that I was completely oblivious to there even being a problem before.

    Anyway, the question—regarding things happening entirely out of your control, what would be the best and worst things that could happen to lemmy from your perspectives? And as an extension, what are your goals for it?

    • nutomic@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      The best thing would be if Reddit goes the way of Digg. Seems that will happen sooner or later. The worst thing, maybe if funding stops and we are unable to keep working on Lemmy. But even then admins could still host Lemmy instances.

      • Tangentism@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        The best thing would be if Reddit goes the way of Digg.

        Well, it has already. The only reason it hasn’t fully imploded & all the users deserted for another site, is because there wasn’t an equivalent place to go to.

        They were sort of parallel in development but digg blew up and Reddit didn’t then Digg took a quick hard turn towards enshitification.

        Reddit has done the enshitification but like a parasitic infected spider, it’s wandering about and most of the users haven’t realised yet that it’s an empty shell.

        It’s slow demise would be better in the long run than a quick collapse like Diggs so it’s now putrid culture is not transmitted with an enmass exodus.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.mlOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Thx! Its pretty wild to me how much these algorithms, and formats, affect our mental well-being. Those giant US tech companies employing Psychology PhDs to figure out how to keep people angry, engaged, and watching ads, is doing so much harm to so many people, not just in the US, but the whole world, and unfortunately very few countries are doing enough to protect their people from these companies (who also act as surveillance arms of the US state) by blocking facebook and the rest.

      I’ve seen two professors I respected turn into angry children on twitter, in a way that would never happen in real life. Reddit, twitter, and Youtube platform reactionary rage-bait to get people trapped in a downward spiral of negativity. These companies do not care how much damage they do; all that matters to them is their profits.

      We don’t have those same incentive structures, so we can and should be doing everything we can to make this a positive and enjoyable experience, not about arguing constantly, but about learning, laughing, and understanding.

      what would be the best and worst things that could happen to lemmy from your perspectives? And as an extension, what are your goals for it?

      The best thing would be that we continue our slow and steady growth. Every user that migrates away from big tech to the fediverse is victory, so while we shouldn’t emphasize growth at any cost, its still a good thing when we can get people away from all that negativity.

      The biggest concern for me about Lemmy, would be a centralization onto one big server, that tries to replicate all the worst things and behaviors about reddit: its combativeness, xenophobia, bigotry, pro-US-foreign policy agendas, and advertising. There is a noticeable chunk of Lemmy’s users who don’t really see any problem with those things, they just want a reddit that lets them use 3rd party apps again.

    • Steve@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m pretty sure all user data is public already.
      PMs might be the only thing not everyone can see.

      • Deebster@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        IPs and access logs, plus email addresses aren’t public and are the kind of thing law enforcement wants.

      • jackpot@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        whats that thing where a company has a ‘we have never been contacted by law enforement or have been forced to disclose data’ sign on their website that theyll take down to implicitly inform users theyve received a request and a silencing order

  • glibg10b@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    Please stop using time zone abbreviations. Everyone can read an offset (UTC +02:00 in this case). But almost everyone has to look up the abbreviation

  • Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    What is currently in the works to help admins locate spammers and problematic users on their instance?

    Right now I believe it relies heavily on users reporting and admins looking through a users history however I think that is really inefficient.

    Are there any better visualization tools that could be made to aid admins?

    • Dessalines@lemmy.mlOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Registration applications, and user reports are the best way to handle trolls. The first stops 90% of them, the second means we can ban and remove all their spam at the click of a button.

      I don’t see how you could prematurely know about spammers or trolls until someone reports them. We don’t plan on adding any text-analyzing AI or anything like that into lemmy’s codebase.

      • Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I don’t see how you could prematurely know about spammers or trolls until someone reports them.

        I don’t think you can. My suggestion was more focused on how admins make decisions after a report. Right now they have to do a manual scan of the person’s comment history and that is the part I find inefficient. If it was possible to just show extra high level information on the user it might make it easier for the admin to make a decision.

        We don’t plan on adding any text-analyzing AI or anything like that into lemmy’s codebase.

        Yeah using AI to try and analyze comments would be overkill and probably prone to manipulation anyways.

        Edit: I’m sorta talking more specifically towards banning a user or seeing if what a user is doing is a repeated pattern.

        • Dessalines@lemmy.mlOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I don’t think there’s a way you could avoid going into their history. I do that as an admin to verify that the account in question is indeed repeatedly breaking rules. I’m open to suggestions tho.

      • Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Well I am not 100% sure on what the best method would be.

        I think the addition of letting moderators see who is voting on what posts is a nice addition since they would tend to be closer to where the content is.

        More generally I was thinking about creating a dashboard that gave the admins statistics about that user.

        Similar to how we as users can see how many comments and posts any user makes, it might be useful to allow admins to see statistics about which communities the user interacts with or some rudimentary similarity score with other users?

        These are some ideas I thought of on the fly and have not thought about the implications but the gist is something that allows the admins to get a better understanding of what is going on from like a bird eye’s view.

        Edit: and where -> on what posts

        • CannotSleep420@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          This seems like a big change that also requires a lot of brainstorming to flesh out. It sounds like it would best be made as an RFC for now.

        • nutomic@lemmy.mlM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          The main implication is that someone would have to implement it, and we dont have enough developers for that.

          • Danterious@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            Yeah that’s fair. It was just more of a possible what if.

            Hopefully you’re able to get more people that can help develop the features that are in the backlog.

            Anyways thx for answering. I was half expecting it to be skipped.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Will Lemmy ever become more of an organization? I’m slightly concerned about hostile take overs and or major changes that could be driven by personal views or bias.

    Also a organization could facilitate cooperation and organize events.

    • Dessalines@lemmy.mlOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      As a multi-national open source dev team, it would only complicate our lives to try to set up a more formal legal structure.

      I wouldn’t be too afraid of hostile takeovers: this is a dev-run-and-controlled project. People will go where the development is, and the federated nature of lemmy protects against the kind of attacks its possible to make against centralized entities.

    • pingveno@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      If Lemmy does become more of an organization, it would be nice to have a level of public assurance over any control exerted by the organization. A lot of people see that the lead developers of Lemmy are communist and shy away from it based merely on that. I have one of the oldest accounts on Lemmy, I’ve seen plenty of them, and my impression is that they have conducted themselves with only the utmost ethics. However, it can still help newcomers who don’t want to feel like someone might be breathing down their neck.

    • phiresky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Lemmy is somewhat protected by being an AGPL-licensed project, preventing proprietarization. If there’s ever a relicensing effort, ba fearful.

      I’m not sure what exactly becoming a organization would entail, but so far I’d say the development part is not really large enough? For me I would start being suspicious when a significant amount of dev power came from compan(ies), but so far no company has shown any interest afaik.

      There’s already been a few forks, for example lemmynsfw has made some changes on their side, which nutomic is now looking to integrate back into lemmy.

  • Calavera@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Hi again,

    1 - Now that there are multiple apps for lemmy, wouldn’t be better to handover jerboa to someone else and focus more on core lemmy?

    2 - How was the inception moment for lemmy? When and how did you decided to leave reddit and create something new and how was the first couple months?

    Thanks and come to Brazil ;)

    • Dessalines@lemmy.mlOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Thx!

      1. Jerboa has another major contributor now besides me. But I’d also like to keep a hand in it, simply because I made it and its also the main app I use for lemmy. Besides a few other people, no one has stepped up to get involved with it enough that I’d. Plus I’d eventually like to add it to the LemmyNet repo, as it will soon implement all of the features in lemmy-ui, making it an “official” and native app.

      2. Reddit has been banning communist / leftist communities for a while, so a lot of us were looking at different reddit alternatives. I found that none of them had a great tech stack, none of them had federation, and a few were unwelcoming to contributions. It made sense to do a “what if reddit, but open source, made in rust, and self-hostable”. It was a great opportunity to teach myself rust also.

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    Regarding funding - Can you give a detailed breakdown of what you’ve gotten per year and from which sources since you started Lemmy?