• radiofreeval [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    11 months ago

    seems to be soley writing anti-China posts for western media. This doesn’t change the fact that prisons are inhumane and should be abolished. I reccomend any of Angela Davis’ works on the topic.

      • radiofreeval [she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Systems of rehabilitation and methods to prevent crime, not punish it. Look up Angela Davis for someone smarter than me who has explained it better.

        • Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          Prisons will still be necessary for the most egregious and irredeemable criminals. The sad reality is that there are certain people who simply need to be sequestered from the rest of society for the general public’s safety, and no amount of rehabilitation or intervention will solve that. But that should be the exception, not the norm. The massive prison population is absolutely a problem, but it isn’t something that can be completely abolished. It may be called something else in the future (like a long-term involuntary mental health facility,) but it’s still serving the same basic function while wearing a more friendly mask.

          • spectre [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            It could be abolished in the sense that the “location where we keep the most irredeemable people in society, who absolutely can not be left unsupervised” may not be a “prison”, but some other secure facility that maximizes the ability of these people to make whatever contribution they may be able to make to society.

            • Mic_Check_One_Two@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              11 months ago

              but some other secure facility that maximizes the ability of these people to make whatever contribution to society they may be able to make to society.

              Yeah, I touched on that with my last sentence:

              It may be called something else in the future (like a long-term involuntary mental health facility,) but it’s still serving the same basic function while wearing a more friendly mask.

              There are two problems with that. The first is that “maximizing contribution to society” can easily be interpreted as “being forced to stamp license plates for 16 hours a day.” We already know this is a possible interpretation, because that’s how our system already interprets it. Either way they’re locked up against their will, and are being forced to perform labor to someone else’s benefit. The very nature of their confinement means that any contribution they make will be for someone else and not themselves. And the simple word for that is “slavery”. The second problem is that it’s still prison. We haven’t actually solved the prison problem at all in this scenario; We’ve simply given it a mask so we can say prisons have been abolished. Like if we don’t call them prisons, we can say we don’t have any prisoners.