Context:

The article in question was well sourced, factually accurate, and written by a well-renowned author and journalist whose work appears elsewhere too, regardless of which outlet published it.

Nonetheless, Jordan Lund is once again blindly trusting a pro-zionist conservative outlet masquerading as a bias and fact checker that nothing from anywhere that criticizes the fascist apartheid regime can be reliable 🤦

    • _cryptagion [he/him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      Well, you’re allowed to. But you’re not allowed to ignore the part about the source being right and still act like you’re not full of shit.

      • AlDente@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        14 hours ago

        You know, you actually might be right. If the website was akin to a bar and the reasonable article was just a normal customer; however, the rest of the customers (i.e. content) were Nazis, then it definitely doesn’t make it all a Nazi bar. That normal customer can absolutely be right!