Considering what was before, it was a gradual step towards socialism. Nazi Germany existed for like 30 years.
Ah, yes. And Hitler clearly stated that he was a socialist… somewhere. You have to read between the lines of “Mein Kampf”, where he clearly states that he’s right wing. And all the companies who profited immensly from all that slave labour where juuuust about to be socialised. /s
Uhuh. Is Charles Fourier socialist?
Got any proper points, or are you just gonna “umm actually” me to death?
What is that even supposed to mean?
You’re a weirdo who deserves to be ridiculed for having such a stupid worldview.
Wie oft haben wir uns geschüttelt vor Lachen über diese einfältigen bürgerlichen Angsthasen, angesichts des geistvollen Rätselratens über unsere Herkunft, unsere Absichten und unser Ziel. Wir haben die rote Farbe unserer Plakate nach genauem und gründlichem Überlegen gewählt, um dadurch die linke Seite zu reizen, zur Empörung zu bringen und sie zu verleiten, in unsere Versammlungen zu kommen, wenn auch nur, um sie zu sprengen, damit wir auf diese Weise überhaupt mit den Leuten reden konnten.
They stated that as their goal. The Nazis stated a Reich enuring 1000 years as their goal. Did those succeed?
So unless someone achieves communism, they’re not a communist? Btw, since 3rd Reich didn’t follow all nazi tenants and didn’t achieve all nazi goals, maybe they weren’t nazis?
Name one socialist that came after Marx that doesn’t agree with him in some manner or the other
Hitler
Sorry, but you’ve set up this perfect punchline yourself.
Please, enlighten me
Oh, so you don’t know what my views are, but have already concluded they’re absurd. Well, jokes on you, I’m an anarcho communist (no)
Ah, yes. And Hitler clearly stated that he was a socialist… somewhere. You have to read between the lines of “Mein Kampf”, where he clearly states that he’s right wing. And all the companies who profited immensly from all that slave labour where juuuust about to be socialised. /s
Got any proper points, or are you just gonna “umm actually” me to death?
You’re a weirdo who deserves to be ridiculed for having such a stupid worldview.
I didn’t say it. Although he did.
Where?
Btw are bolsheviks communists? Bc they clearly stated they are. No need to even read between the lines.
And what’s the relation between capitalism and slavery?
The point is that socialists can be socialists without applying Marx works in any way.
What worldview? What is my worldview?
Where? Here, maybe, where he ridicules the people who think the Nazis were socialists?
In this chapter, for example
They stated that as their goal. The Nazis stated a Reich enuring 1000 years as their goal. Did those succeed?
They’re compatible.
Name one socialist that came after Marx that doesn’t agree with him in some manner or the other.
Please, enlighten me. I could do with a bit of absurd fantasy worldbuilding.
So unless someone achieves communism, they’re not a communist? Btw, since 3rd Reich didn’t follow all nazi tenants and didn’t achieve all nazi goals, maybe they weren’t nazis?
Hitler
Sorry, but you’ve set up this perfect punchline yourself.
Oh, so you don’t know what my views are, but have already concluded they’re absurd. Well, jokes on you, I’m an anarcho communist (no)
Sure you didn’t read that in a dream?
Why did you ask whether or not the bolsheviki were communists, exactly?
Circular logic as an “argument”, then. Gotcha.
You’ve given enough hints (you consider yourself far right than call the Nazis far left), so I took a guess. I was open to reach another conclusion…
… But clearly, you’re afraid of further ridicule.