The application includes a legal opinion by a retired superior court justice (who did the opinion on the condition of remaining anonymous) supporting prosecuting the PM for the allegation of obstruction of justice, and possibly also for breach of trust
Being unwilling to put a name to it, even while retired seems like a huge red flag for the credibility of the claim.
Being unwilling to put a name to it, even while retired seems like a huge red flag for the credibility of the claim.