lawrence@lemmy.worldM to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 1 year agoClimate Summitlemmy.worldimagemessage-square115fedilinkarrow-up11.9Karrow-down124
arrow-up11.87Karrow-down1imageClimate Summitlemmy.worldlawrence@lemmy.worldM to Comic Strips@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square115fedilink
minus-squareiiGxC@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up20arrow-down2·1 year agoIt’s equivalent to “for no reason” not to “for no cost”
minus-squarehelenslunch@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down12·edit-23 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squareExatron@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down2·1 year agoIt would cost far more to not address the issue.
minus-squarelieuwex@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down2·1 year agoBut the man in the comic assumes there is no issue at play.
minus-squarehelenslunch@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down3·edit-23 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squareExatron@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·1 year agoNo, it’s making fun of that assumption.
minus-squarezarkanian@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·1 year agoSo, you don’t believe those things are worth the cost, absent the threat of climate change?
minus-squarehelenslunch@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·edit-23 months agodeleted by creator
minus-squarezarkanian@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down1·1 year agoWhat conversation are we having?
It’s equivalent to “for no reason” not to “for no cost”
deleted by creator
It would cost far more to not address the issue.
But the man in the comic assumes there is no issue at play.
deleted by creator
No, it’s making fun of that assumption.
So, you don’t believe those things are worth the cost, absent the threat of climate change?
deleted by creator
What conversation are we having?
deleted by creator