YES. Next question.
Breaking betteridge’s law!
I think you have typo in you headline
Danielle Smith and Postmedia ARE on Team Trump
both of them are actively financed and supported by US interests … Smith has plenty of US business interests and Postmedia is American owned
Not saying Smith isn’t. But she’s so incompetent she seems to be losing Pierre votes.
Does water make things wet?
deftly dodging an endless debate
Just popping in to say fuck kevin o’leary. That fucking loser would suck a elephants cock to be donald trump for 5 minutes.
I always found him to be slimy AF, always worshipping the wealthy purely because of their wealth. Anyone not rich seemed to be a waste of space in his eyes.
deleted by creator
Duh. Of course they are.
Is the Pope Catholic?
This is a good article but I wish we would stop asking questions when the answers are obvious, and instead make statements.
This headline should be “Danielle Smith and Postmedia are on Team Trump”. The article supports this conclusion well.
As it stands it gives the article a cowardly vibe of “oh we’re just asking questions” when this article clearly is not. It would feel more authentic to just call a spade a spade.
Lawsuits are neat.
The article text doesn’t appear to be overly concerned with pulling punches to avoid lawsuits. For example:
What Danielle Smith is doing is treasonous. She is colluding with the enemy during war time and suggesting they interfere with a Canadian election
So my issue is more that the title appears to be watered down or phrased in a clickbait-friendly way?
It has to be in the form of a question because obvious is not the same as provable in court.
Is that even a question?
and if it is, does the definitive answer matter in a situation where their actions demonstrate no functional difference from being on side with our president’s lunacy (hi, american, sorry)
Yea it’s a distinction without a difference.
The end result is a traitorous fuck either way.
