The prime minister was asked if he’ll pursue a governing pact with the NDP. “No,” he said.

And why not, the reporter asked.

“Why?” Carney retorted.

The PM said the Liberals campaigned on a clear set of objectives, and while they didn’t quite get a majority, “we will be putting forth legislation that’s consistent with our platform.”

  • ikidd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    Frankly, I’d be more inclined to give the NDP bargaining power than BQ. At least it’s likely to benefit all Canadian, not just Quebec.

    • gonzo-rand19@moist.catsweat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Carney could literally ignore the NDP for the next 4 years and I doubt it would make any difference. I say this as an NDP voter.

      BQ has over 3 times the seats, it makes way more sense to try to work with them because you only need to convince 4/22 of them instead of 4/7 (and the things that BQ asks for in return may be a lot more politically achievable than whatever the NDP asks for, because they like to go big).

      Carney may also want to cosy up to Quebec voters who were not entirely impressed with his French and don’t trust him. Having a good relationship with BQ may go a long way for these people.

      I don’t love it, but the NDP don’t have leverage here.

        • gonzo-rand19@moist.catsweat.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          Considering that Muslims and anglos are minorities in Quebec, I doubt the Liberals or BQ care about that as long as they can get their flagship bills voted through. Like I get where you’re coming from, I just don’t think they give a shit.

            • gonzo-rand19@moist.catsweat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              30 days ago

              I agree that ignoring 4.6% of the provincial population is misguided. I’m certainly not advocating for it, but that’s the reality.

              In the context of Bill 21, what does it mean to take a bill seriously when it doesn’t affect you? As far as I’m concerned, the Liberals would never implement something like that nationwide even if they were forced to more significantly rely on BQ for support.