Well, fuck

  • Grimtuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    5 days ago

    Out of interest, what personal interests would the other candidate have been against? I’m genuinely interested and I’d rather ask you than just downvote like others have done that probably have no idea about either candidate.

    • nudny ekscentryk@szmer.info
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      I want public healthcare — which neither candidates supports. Trzaskowskis party literally proposed to reduce the healthcare budget by 20bln like a month ago

      I want marriage equality — which neither candidate supports. Trzaskowski is said to be in favour but he never said it straigh up and he vocally opposes same-sex adoption.

      I want affordable housing — which neither candidate supports. Both parties similarly had their housing programmes which caused the market prices to soar and opposed public housing.

      I want ecology — both candidates oppose nuclear power and Trzaskowskis party literally cut public forestry budget and increased the deforestation rate

      I want the church to shut up and stop stealing public money — Trzaskowskis party, despite being called “anticlerical” gave the 20% increase of the Church Budget in 2025. Their original promise was to reduce it to 0.

      I want a reasonable migration policy — both candidates’ parties use migrants as scapegoats and support limiting asylum laws.

      I want access to abortion — which Nawrocki opposes; Trzaskowski himself supports it, but some of his party and majority of his coalition doesn’t and will never vote for it

      Both candidates are shit in their own way