cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/31250679

"this morning, as I was finishing up work on a video about a new mini Pi cluster, I got a cheerful email from YouTube saying my video on LibreELEC on the Pi 5 was removed because it promoted:

Dangerous or Harmful Content Content that describes how to get unauthorized or free access to audio or audiovisual content, software, subscription services, or games that usually require payment isn’t allowed on YouTube.

I never described any of that stuff, only how to self-host your own media library.

This wasn’t my first rodeo—in October last year, I got a strike for showing people how to install Jellyfin!

In that case, I was happy to see my appeal granted within an hour of the strike being placed on the channel. (Nevermind the fact the video had been live for over two years at that point, with nary a problem!)

So I thought, this case will be similar:

  • The video’s been up for over a year, without issue
  • The video’s had over half a million views
  • The video doesn’t promote or highlight any tools used to circumvent copyright, get around paid subscriptions, or reproduce any content illegally

Slam-dunk, right? Well, not according to whomever reviewed my appeal. Apparently self-hosted open source media library management is harmful.

Who knew open source software could be so subversive?"

  • Ardens@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    12 hours ago

    We all know that using youtube, it like trying to stay on the good side of a huge bully. I still can’t figure out why anyone would like to use it, and other similar sites.

  • Etterra@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Powerful entities will destroy any threat to their power. It’s literally the story of human civilization.

  • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    Some in the fediverse ask why I’m not on Peertube. Here’s the problem (and it’s not insurmountable): right now, there’s no easy path towards sustainable content production when the audience for the content is 100x smaller, and the number of patrons/sponsors remains proportionally the same.

    I was never able to sustain my open source work based on patronage, and content production is the same—just more expensive to maintain to any standard (each video takes between 10-300 hours to produce, and I have a family to feed, and US health insurance companies to fund).

    Just cross post to both Peertube and YouTube?

    • りん〜@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      Where do you even find good content on peertube? It doesn’t have an algorithm that promotes the best videos :c

      • helmet91@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        To be fair, YouTube doesn’t have an algorithm that promotes the best videos, either. For quite some time now, it just promotes garbage.

          • JayGray91🐉🍕@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Same here. And my current account isn’t even old either. I seem to be able to control my algorithm really well. Any hint if something I’m not interested in I just be diligent clicking “Not interested”.

      • Jayb151@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 day ago

        Agreed. I find pretty much all of YouTube’s open source competitors have content that is primarily tech nerds and hot Russian ladies.