• Kichae@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    23 hours ago

    What investment? We’ve pumped millions of dollars into these companies to get them to expand their networks to rural communities, and they’ve just shoved it up their ass like a cash enema. They’re definitely not spending their own money on improving services.

    The only systems they’re incentivized to improve are the ones that funnel our cash into their pockets.

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Break them up into infrastructure and ISP services. Infrastructure is a natural monopoly, they can compete over services on top of it if they want.

  • Pyr@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    They don’t invest, they take tax payer funded subsidies and then bill us for the pleasure.

  • Kindness is Punk@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Internet should be a public utility, not having access to affordable,reliable internet is one of the drivers of inequality and should not be left to corporations acting on the profit motive.

  • Tiger666@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Why have we privatized public services? These companies should be nationalized and every executive put in jail.

  • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    2 days ago

    The big three trying to hold us hostage to gain more government dollars is par for the course. Assholes gotta asshole I guess.

    Maybe it’s time to cut them off at their knees.

  • walktheplank@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yea well since the internet is gone to shit and corpos keep using me as a bank machine I’m seriously considering saying fuck the phone and internet. However I need some way to stay connected so we can organize the overthrow of our government. It’s the only thing keeping me online right now.

    • Daniel Quinn@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 days ago

      Any plan that starts with “If everyone can just…” is doomed to fail. This needs legislation and at least the threat of nationalisation if not the act.

    • Reannlegge@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 days ago

      Been on Sasktel all my life, started getting more actively involved in politics when Wall wanted to sell 49% (or 51% I don’t remember) of Sasktel as a trial run or whatever the heck he called it.

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        I don’t see how 51% could be a trial of anything as they’d lose control. 49% you could see how pressure from investors harms the company though and could painfully be walked back from. Terrible idea though.

        • DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          They were considering selling 49%, but the percentage is meaningless without looking at the articles, the bylaws, and resolutions. A lot of corporations make things more strict than the Bus Corp. act. You can always make things more strict, you can’t make them more lax.

          In fact, some things require a “Special Resolution” which is 2/3rds.
          BUT, that can mean 2/3 of the shareholders who show up, as long as enough people show up to make a quorum.
          And a quorum can be as small as 1 person, again, depending on the Articles, bylaws, and resolutions.

          If you feel like learning about the Saskatchewan Business Corporations act, here is it:
          https://www.canlii.org/en/sk/laws/astat/ss-2021-c-6/latest/ss-2021-c-6.html