Each of these reads like an extremely horny and angry man yelling their basest desires at Pornhub’s search function.

  • jeremyparker@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    The danbooru aspect of the “AI” moral panic is what annoys me.

    So many of my friends - many of whom are amateur artists - hate computer generated images because the copyright of the artists were violated, and they weren’t even asked. And I agree that does kinda suck - but - how did that happen?

    Danbooru.

    The art had already been “stolen” and was available online for free. Where was their morality then? For the last decade or whatever that danbooru has been up? Danbooru is who violated the copyright, not stable diffusion or whatever.

    At least computer generated imagery is different, like, the stuff it was trained on was exactly their art, while this stuff, while might look like theirs, is unique. (And often with a unique number of fingers.)

    And, if “copyright” is their real concern, them surely they understand that copyright only protects against someone making a profit of their work, right? Surely they’ll have looked into it and they already know that “art” made by models that used copyrighted content for training are provided from being copyrighted themselves, right? And that you can only buy/sell content made from models that are in the copyright clear, surely they know all this?

    No, of course not. They don’t give a shit about copyright, they just got the ickies from new tech.