Each of these reads like an extremely horny and angry man yelling their basest desires at Pornhub’s search function.

  • rhabarba@feddit.deOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    Repeat: FOR FREE! No product!

    If it’s free, chances are you’re the product. I assume that there is a market for user-generated “prompts” somewhere.

    • And009@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      There’s a market for commission artists doing this for money since the dawn of art

    • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      No, that’s not how open-source or open-source philosophies work. They share their work because they were able to download other people’s work, and sometimes people improve upon their own work.

      These aren’t corporations. You don’t need to immediately jump to capitalistic conclusions. Just jump on Unstable Diffusion Discord or CivitAI yourself. It’s all free.

      • rhabarba@feddit.deOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        These aren’t corporations.

        I know, I know: “but the website is free” (for now). However, Civit AI, Inc. is not a loose community. There must be something that pays their bills. I wonder what it is.

          • jeremyparker@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            I feel like you’re implying people should look into things before making accusations. Like, find out if what they’re saying is true before they say it. And that’s why no one asked you to the prom.

        • infamousta@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          They’re probably losing money now and just trying to build a user base as a first-mover. They accept donations and subscriptions with fairly minor benefits, but I imagine hosting and serving sizable AI models is not cheap.

          They’ll probably have to transition to paid access at some point, but I don’t see it as particularly unethical as they have bills to pay and do attempt to moderate content on the site.

          I tend to agree generating adult content of real people is unethical, but probably less so than how a lot of real porn is made. I don’t think there should be open avenues for sharing that kind of stuff online, and their rules should be better enforced.

          • Joshua Casey@lemmynsfw.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            11 months ago

            I tend to agree generating adult content of real people is unethical, but probably less so than how a lot of real porn is made.

            wholeheartedly disagree. “real porn” is literally made by consenting adult performers. Hence, it’s ethical. Generating adult content of real people is (typically) done without the consent of the people involved, thereby making it unethical.

            • infamousta@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              If you don’t think anything unethical happens in the production of porn I’m not sure what to tell you. It’s getting better but exploitation, sex trafficking, revenge porn, etc. have been a thing since pornography was invented.

              AI porn at least does not necessarily need to consider consent. Plenty of AI porn involves animated figures or photorealistic humans that don’t represent any identifiable person.

              The only hang up I have is producing images of actual people without their consent, and I don’t think it’s a new problem as photoshop has existed for a while.