• Flax@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    Lemmy moment. Claims human rights are being violated because smartphone gets locked

    • coffeeClean@infosec.pubOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Don’t try to strawman this. Human rights are violated when someone is deprived of their property (their data in the case at hand). If food is withheld from starving people in Gaza, your argument is like saying:

      “Claims human rights are being violated because someone failed to drive a truck”

      • Flax@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Someone not paying a phone bill doesn’t equate to someone bombing Israel

        • coffeeClean@infosec.pubOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          They’re not at odds. We don’t have to choose between protecting UDHR Art.3 and Art.17. It’s foolish to disregard some portion of the UDHR needlessly and arbitrarily.

    • owen@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      He presented his logic and included well-recognised definitions and sources. He literally could not have done better without a peer review in the field 🤣🤣

      So: shut up bitch