roon@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 7 months agoHilariouslemmy.mlimagemessage-square21fedilinkarrow-up130arrow-down11file-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up129arrow-down1imageHilariouslemmy.mlroon@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square21fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareEunieIsTheBus@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up2·7 months agoPoint four was the first thing I immediately noticed.
minus-squareSolivine@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 months agoTechnically 102 if you include the one already said
minus-squareEunieIsTheBus@feddit.delinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 months agoNo, they explicitely demanded the 100 times after the say-i-am-sorry-once-routine terminated
minus-squareSolivine@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 months agoIt wasn’t explicit! What if the amount of sorries is stored in a global state? She didn’t necessarily specify 100 more sorries. Women so confusing smh.
minus-squareibasaw@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·7 months agoforever scarred by OBO errors… I noticed that too
Point four was the first thing I immediately noticed.
Technically 102 if you include the one already said
No, they explicitely demanded the 100 times after the say-i-am-sorry-once-routine terminated
It wasn’t explicit! What if the amount of sorries is stored in a global state? She didn’t necessarily specify 100 more sorries. Women so confusing smh.
forever scarred by OBO errors… I noticed that too