• Doc Avid Mornington@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m nearly fifty, now. Why am I disillusioned by capitalism? Because the illusion is thin and flimsy. I really hope the disillusionment of millennials isn’t just because they don’t have a good enough retirement plan, or anything else that can be easily fixed. I hope that they are waking up to realize that giving unelected, unaccountable, private owners of capital control over the production and distribution of goods, services, and information, is an extremist, antidemocratic idea, that is driving the global climate crisis, and the slide toward fascism.

    • HomebrewHedonist@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I love this comment. You put into words what I’ve been trying to convey to others. Thank you.

      I believe that all concentrations of power are potentially dangerous because you never know into what hands that concentration of power is being put. Too often it’s concentrated in the hands of those personality types of the dark triad: narcissists, machiavellians, psychopaths. Those people should never have any authority or control over any human beings, and they should be prohibited from being in powewful positions. They are far too dangerous, and I believe that most of our world problems derive from these personality types.

      • EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Holy shit even their mental health claims about others is projection, I’m absolutely screaming on the rooftops.

        • HomebrewHedonist@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I’m describing Cluster B personality disorders. The science is there and it’s real. All these people should never be in ANY positions of power or over people. That is my point. They are too dangerous.

          • Doof@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            I know what the fuck yah are talking about and you have proven my point with this ignorant ass comment. Educate yourself.

            • HomebrewHedonist@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Ah… so I struck a nerve. Maybe I found one in the wild?

              This isn’t personal to you, so don’t take offense. If you do belong to this group, I’m sorry to say, you’re not well. If you don’t, I don’t know why you’re trying to deny that this is real science. It’s not hard to verify for anyone who does simple research. Heck, you could go to a public library and find plenty of scientific sources.

              For everyone else reading this, Cluster B: A person with this type has difficulties regulating their emotions and behavior. Others may consider their behavior dramatic, emotional, or erratic. There are four cluster B disorders: antisocial, borderline, histrionic, and narcissistic personality disorders.

              You can find sources everywhere, but here is where I grabbed the above: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/320508#:~:text=Cluster B%3A A person with,histrionic%2C and narcissistic personality disorders.

              This is the dark triad I was talking about. I believe that people with this disorder should never be allowed to hold any positions of power whatsoever. They have proven to be too dangerous. If you read about the symptoms, it’s pretty easy to understand why.

              • Doof@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Some weekend researcher talking to someone who is in this field, so maybe ask yourself if you really know what the hell you are talking about.

                Yea it is personal to me because I get to see the damage people like you that parrot uninformed bullshit that hurts real human beings, vilifying people they have no qualifications to speak about.

                The dark triad is pop science of the worst kind helping fund the personality test market. You can also find sources on the contrary, and you can learn the background of the two people who created it. Do you think psychiatrist are using things like the dark triad questionnaires or the 16 personality test to help diagnose a patient? No.

                I’m not even going into the positions of power, my point stick with the usefulness of the dark triad.

                • HomebrewHedonist@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Lol! Bull shit!

                  Nice try tho. 😅

                  I was wondering who I’m dealing with and I read some of your comments. You admitted in one that your autistic. You wrote: “As an autistic person who struggles…”.

                  Yeah… you’re in the field… as a patient!

                  Again, my comment is backed by plenty of medical science. I know, because I am studying this, and it’s super easy to find just doing a Google search. There are a ton of academic papers on this.

                  Here is just one: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0092656602005056

                  Whoever you are, you’re a shining example of what is bad about social media, and you’re exactly the kind of person that I was talking about in this tread. May you never hold any power over anyone.

  • StayDoomed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    Bring back tax rates of 90% again for the obscenely rich - it was that way up until the late 1900s. Back when the US actually funded things that benefit most people not just tax breaks for already rich people.

    • Zippy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      You could tax them at 100% but it wouldn’t fix the problem. There are simply just not enough of them. While wealth inequality is a problem, this alone don’t fix it. It is just a crutch.

      • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 months ago

        no, increasing taxes on the wealthy, while simultaneously funding the IRS to go after white collar tax cheats, would 100% fix the problem.

        • Zippy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          7 months ago

          And this would somehow cause a significant number of houses to be built? And if people have more money thru distribution of some sort, would they work harder to build more houses? If they don’t, how does this help?

          • jpreston2005@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            after perusing your other comments, I’ve come to the conclusion that you’re a disingenuous right wing troll. I don’t care to educate you on something you’ll more than likely ignore.

          • Kedly@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            7 months ago

            Taxes could pay for government hired construction workers/companies to build government funded housing. Easy, try another goal post

              • Kedly@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                Construction workers are people who work in the field of construction. Framers, tapers, plumbers, electricians, etc.

    • 24_at_the_withers@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 months ago

      You’re talking about income tax rates, and I agree that the top tax rates should be higher, but this won’t fix the problem because billionaires don’t make their money from salaries. Most of their money is theoretical and tied up in ownership of shares of a company.

      They can sell shares or earn dividends to make money, so capital gains should also be taxed at a much higher rate. But billionaires often choose not to sell shares either because they have a better option…

      They take out low interest rates loans using their shares as collateral. The interest rates they are charged are generally going to be far lower than the interest on their stocks that stay invested,. This is where most of their liquidity comes from, because loans aren’t taxed, and in some regard is almost an infinite money glitch for billionaires.

      I think we need to make it illegal to use financial holdings as collateral for loans, at least for starters.

      • SacralPlexus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I think we need to make it illegal to use financial holdings as collateral for loans, at least for starters.

        And maybe a tax on assets over a set limit. Own more than $10M in assets? Time to start paying back society.