• Blaster M@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    So these are basically the old 2G phones but with a USB-C port and a new chipset.

    They still only support 2G, so are useless anywhere that requires 4G VoLTE and where 2G/3G has been shut down.

    • ramble81@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      9 months ago

      What’s the point then?! Update the cell bands so people at least have an option to use them.

      • Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Developing countries. When I lived in one a few years ago I got a Nokia brick phone the same as I had around 2002, it went 5-6 days on a charge in a place with ‘random’ electricity.

    • ar0177417@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      9 months ago

      Having 2G support doesn’t mean it doesn’t have 4g support. I have a phone which supports 2g 3g and 4g.

      • 4am@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        9 months ago

        The article literally says they don’t work with anything newer than 2G

  • lnxtx (xe/xem/xyr)@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    I have Nokia 3310 from the HMD.
    Hardware looks fine, but software is slow and buggy.

    More like a collection item than a daily driver.