• AstridWipenaugh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    What’s the alternative? Not defending landlords; I genuinely don’t understand. If you don’t have money to buy a home/condo, you’re going to have to rent from someone. Until housing is not subject to scarcity, there will always be landlords.

    • ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Most mortgages are lower than rent.

      But due to overinflated housing prices banks refuse mortgages for the poors.

      If housing prices matched the actual monetary value mortgages would be more accessible for the average person.

      If you want to rent go to a hotel.

    • callouscomic@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If so many jobs didn’t stupidly require college degrees and if college wasn’t stupidly expensive and if wages had kept up with production for the last 50+ years and if corporations werent allowed to own vast swaths of housing and if the world wasn’t run by greedy power hungry capitalists then maybe, just maybe, PERHAPS people might have a few extra bucks to be able to afford something.

      Just a thought. Maybe, the issue is money has been taken from the people in so many ways.

    • HandwovenConsensus@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Henry George wrote about this extensively. The solution is a tax on all land at just under 100% of it’s rental value. That allows landlords to profit from the structures they build and maintain, but not from the land itself. It disincentivizes real estate speculation, lowering the cost of land and housing and improving accessibility to people who use it productively.

    • triplenadir@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      housing cooperatives

      social housing

      banning private rental so that more people can afford to buy.

      in approximately that order of priority

    • HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Two (current) real world solutions: Most people in China outright own their homes with no mortgage, as the government owns the land itself and subsidizes housing purchases and even outright gives housing to its citizens. Similarly, most people in Singapore live in subsidized government housing.

    • mycorrhiza they/them@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I might be wrong, but I think even if you changed nothing else about society except abolishing landlording, supply and demand would drive down home costs and force banks to offer mortgages to the people they currently deny. Ideally though, abolishing landlording would be part of a larger change to the way housing works.

    • ShranTheWaterPoloFan@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      You ever think about how weird most housing is?

      Suburbia is lines of houses with the same items in them not being used. Full of people who become petty tyrants comparing about a car being parked to close or a yard not neat enough.

      If you start to question how we should live together it’s easier to see a way for landlords to cease to exist.