Because of the implication?
Because of the implication?
Maybe it should have been Target Archery to avoid confusion?
Biden and Trump are no Andrew Tate, amirite? Well, Trump is not too far off.
Outside of the many publications, conferences, symposia, and discussions in the lay media on this topic over multiple decades, they’ve been completely ignoring it. Shameful.
Sarcasm is a tool used by imperialists to undermine free peoples.
To an extent, but you expect demands for hegemony from western imperialists.
In the Hong Kong case, it’s the government - an agent of the people - which is just enforcing the desire of the people to praise the revolution. It’s not that the kids can’t sing softly. It’s that if they sing softly it’s because of the lingering influence of the colonizers. Therefore they need re-education until their minds are properly free.
That sounds like a bunch of baloney.
From the article:
The article was the cover of the Sunday business feature section. Trump did not cut it out to read it and there is no indication that he was even aware of its existence. It is resting on top of a pile of other newspaper sections, which suggests its placement is coincidental.
Reminds me of this one time at Bandwagon…
5% of $4.00 is $0.20. Think of it as 5 cents per dollar.
My husband who disappeared years ago is actually alive and well and conspiring with his friends to downvote my posts and comments. I think he drives by my house from time to time as well.
He is in cahoots with my family, who have custody of my child, to stop my child’s DNA from getting added to a genealogy website because that would prove that he was conceived from incest with a distant relative when I was very young.
Seems really more about what pictures the prosecution decided to use to exemplify the mixing of personal and classified than any particular significance to the article. It wasn’t clipped out or anything.
The copy editor let slip by two repeated words or phrases.
Just when you forgot how terrible Ronny “Johnson” Jackson is.
True about being poor, but at least we’re not Afghanistan.
There is a massive difference in the degree. The situation for women in Afghanistan is terrible. Should no one write articles about girls not being allowed to attend school in Afghanistan because sometimes teachers and administrators at US public schools discourage girls from participating in STEM?
Can’t it be worse in some places than others, and therefore needing more attention there?
That neighbor? Albert Einstein.
I searched for an editorial board opinion in the New York Times which said Trump should withdraw from the Republican ticket because he lied throughout the debate, but I couldn’t find one. Why didn’t they write one?