luckily, they won’t have to learn a thing if trump wins, because MAGAts will stack the odds so much in their favor that no dem will win a presidential election in many years. yay project 2025!

Just minus the “livin” part. But hey, can’t have everything.

Kantai collection perhaps? Don’t actually know what it is, but I’m pretty sure it has humanised warships

How is it fraud? No lies are told, not even implied. It would just be the company making assumptions.

On the other hand, “perfect is the enemy of progress”. While this certainly doesn’t solve the issue, it is an (admittedly minor) improvement.

This was essentially me once, but for real. I was running as exercise and discovered that if i slowed down i didn’t get nearly as tired and could run much further! I thought i had just had an absolutely genius thought and was really proud of myself. It wasn’t until later that i realised that no, i was just being really fucking dumb, as usual.

As his supporters laughed, Trump then went on to say that reporters attending the rally would take his words out of context and tell viewers that the ex-president had said a “horrible” thing onstage.

Title is literally that

Just one objection: Jesus wasn’t perfect, that was kinda a big part of him being born human. He had doubts and, iirc, made mistakes, even according to the bible.

And i think you’re a bit behind the times

The best time for this was 16 years ago. The second best time was right when you posted this.

Hence the “abiding”.

Is this a real question?

hey i think you attracted some of those people you mentioned :)

And after this fiasco I’d wager their feelings have changed.

Perfect name for this comment, really living up to it

Proofreading involves more than just checking grammar, and AIs aren’t perfect. I would never put my name on something to get published publicly like this without reading it through at least once myself.

Imagine naming a bot “android” lmao

monkey

mice

Can you read?

This article from SVT is about police students, not actual police. Clearly not the source for the original article.