• 41 Posts
  • 515 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 4th, 2023

help-circle







  • Yes, that’s clear, but I think Teams is still terrible even in this situation. I really can’t imagine a use case where this app would be a good choice - even if everyone uses Office. What are the advantages? What are people doing that couldn’t be done with any other solution? I realize that it’s probably mainly because employees are set in their ways, but is there really an objective reason why it has to be Teams? And as I said, I mean that even if you ignore the data protection nightmare that this application is.

    Edit: Sorry, I probably misread that. I assume you use Teams because every employee has an MS365 subscription anyway. That seems like a waste of money to me tho, because every Office app can be replaced with a free open source app – except perhaps in the few cases of Excel power users. But that’s just my opinion – in corporate practice, things look very different.








  • This unlawful attempt at forced brainwashing is truly scandalous and absolutely intolerable with its repugnant double standards.

    No one disputes that the terrorist attack by Hamas was brutal.

    Nevertheless, this by no means justifies the genocide being committed by Israel. There are also horrific images of this, of starving children, cold blooded murder of civilians and unbearable suffering - and Israel is even using every means at its disposal to prevent the world from seeing the full extent of their own atrocities.

    If Israel were to adhere even remotely to international law and human rights, Thunberg would not be there.

    It is absurd that this country continues to portray itself as the victim. They are the perpetrators and responsible for crimes against humanity.

    These savages who represent Israel are truly the scum of the earth.


  • DandomRude@lemmy.worldtoPeople Twitter@sh.itjust.worksThe disruptors
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Yes, and I think that was only possible back then because venture capital firms got involved pretty late. Then, as a result of the dot-com bubble they themselves caused, they burned through a lot of money and destroyed a lot of jobs. Ultimately, they shifted their focus to investing heavily in companies where it was clear how profitable they would become and that their market power could be expanded through acquisitions.

    Today, it seems almost impossible to me that a startup without investors could achieve the same level of success as those early Internet companies that have become global corporations. If someone has a good idea, the company is either bought out immediately, or the idea is simply stolen by companies such as Rocket Internet, whose deep pockets quickly ensure that the copy prevails over the original.