3 days ago: https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-68960585.amp

Because Hamas terrorists are firing rockets out of it. Could you explain to me why they’re doing that and risking the their own citizens there?

I never said Hamas was not in Rafah. In fact that’s the opposite of what I said. I did say it was designated a safe zone. Now they’re moving the safe zone to a new area and the people with it.

It’s almost as if they negotiations are on going and this article is just a media outlet trying to get clicks and a narrative going without any concrete info to report on.

Hamas agreed to conditions that were not what Israel put forth. That means they refused to accept those conditions.

Gaza needs to be abide by the ceasefire

Hamas has a long track record of breaking ceasfires. Their demands usually include releasing terrorists that were caught trying to murder civilians within Israel in exchanges that are 1000+:1 with hostages/bodies they hold. For those who aren’t just tuning in just for this latest conflict, this isn’t exactly news worth even mentioning until an actual deal is struck.

Yeah, but headlines like this are just plain misleading. Hamas agreed to conditions that weren’t the ones put forth by Israel. That means it’s effectively meaningless, since we don’t know how much the terms were altered.

An official familiar with Israeli thinking said Israeli officials were examining the proposal, but the plan approved by Hamas was not the framework Israel proposed.

So Hamas accepted a proposal that was not proposed by Israel, effectively making this meaningless. Hamas will also accept proposals for Israel to stop existing, doesn’t mean that will happen either.

Looking at the content posted, that’s clearly a no.

Terrorist group Hamas is shooting rockets from there, so of course Israel isn’t going to ignore it completely. If Hamas stopped hiding behind civilians, the entire area would have been left alone.

Israel literally told Gazans to go to Rafah to be safe. They said it was a safe zone.

And the IDF was operating elsewhere, not entering Rafah at the time.

Now they’re supposed to leave Rafah.

Yes, that’s how it works. It’s like how sometimes during road construction, the construction crew might route you into a different traffic lane. Doesn’t mean that lane will remain safe to drive on forever.

You might ask where Israel thinks Gazans are supposed to go. The answer is- nowhere. They’re supposed to die.

Now this is just plain false, since it doesn’t look like you actually bothered reading any details about it. Israel did in fact tell them where to go.

You realize the name Palestine is what the Romans renamed the land to add insult to injury after kicking out all the Jews.

The zionist game? That’s been the main playbook of all the Hamas supporters. “What do you mean we fired thousands of rockets aim at civilians before the IDF came in here? They’re just trying to oppress our rights to self expression”

Your example has occurred in dozens of companies, but people just don’t care.

The news outlets I saw reporting on this were mostly calling out that violence was started by agitators rather than counter-protestors

Nah, you have it backwards. The protestors broke into a building, so police was sent to get them out. It would be the same outcome as if you decided to break into a building and lock yourself in.

You got a source on that?

Bad timing on your end. The Colombia protestors just raided one of the halls and barricaded themselves in.

Tents on a lawn is one thing, even if they did nothing to silence the calls for hate among their ranks. Breaking (in the literal sense) into a building and causing damage is a whole level of escalation from the protestors. At what point do they shift into a violent riot?

W safety of some students cannot be comprised by granting other students their freedom.

Wrong, try again.