There are easier and better ways to accrue power than running for President. Most candidates want to serve the country, trump obviously excluded.
There are easier and better ways to accrue power than running for President. Most candidates want to serve the country, trump obviously excluded.
That’s not how any of this works. People with substance use disorders use drugs because their brains have literally changed from drug use, not just because “they’re fun”. People in later stages of addiction aren’t having much fun, they’re barely surviving. If we could just teach them to use moderately, that would be amazing.
In an ideal world we’d get people to stop using drugs entirely. Unfortunately, that’s a tough goal to reach for many people. So we try to get them to use less, or differently (eg smoking instead of IV), so that they’re less likely to die.
Because it makes for a more clickbaity headline
I tried going back for a while, but when I couldn’t connect on VPN, I left again.
They’re Canadian, so no
Nice try junior
He reinstated himself?
I guess they were expecting even worse?
Some young people, some old people, some medium people. What a stupid headline. You can find “some people” that think anything.
I see “brutally shot down”, I think oh good. Then I see it’s from Newsweek and I roll my eyes.
Nope
Yes because a substantial portion of them are red hats.
If you think Texans can’t mount an insurgency that would turn extraordinarily bloody for both sides, you’re crazy. A significant part of the military would switch sides too, and we’d have a full blown civil war on our hands.
The Taliban did ok, Texans can probably do better than them
Nope, nonprofits have CEOs too. Especially nonprofit hospitals.
It’s like everyone on this platform is a 15 year old. Someone above just said a hospital shouldn’t have a CEO. They’re children that think CEO means “evil person”.
Wtf is a capitalist or proletarian CEO? A CEO is a CEO. The person running the organization is the chief executive officer.
Is lemmy made up of 15 year olds? You think a hospital can run itself with no one in charge? The comments on this thread are amazing.
I’ve been in a lot of state and federal prisons in the US and I’ve never seen what you describe. The only inmates that are left alone in cells for days at a time are so extraordinarily violent that they can’t be let out without someone getting hurt. Even they have interaction with health and security staff, but it’s through a window.
Disciplinary segregation in every prison I’ve been in usually have two people to a cell whenever possible (which results in much lower suicide risk) and they’re let out several hours a day if they’re safe to do so. They can and do talk to people in adjacent cells all day long.
It’s still fucking miserable, but it’s not what you think.
In Norway, they get much more out of cell time in segregation as long as they’re safe. There are people that are only let out of cell alone, if they’re really violent.
That’s not the point