• 0 Posts
  • 29 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 30th, 2023

help-circle




  • Oh yeah? I’ve already pointed out your posting of disinformation in previous comments. Your response? Blocking me because you knew I was right. Literally half the time you post something the second page of your own source completely discredits your original point. You post clickbait and don’t even bother to read it yourself clown.

    I literally gave you the definition of ad hominem and you still fucked it up. You attack character- not position. You have made 0 counters to any arguments I’ve made. Purely attacking me personally. That’s literally the definition of ad hominem. And you literally havent made any attempt at a point in this discussion- so literally nothing to counter. So yeah- goodbye indeed troll. Again.


  • Lol. Oh really?

    ad ho·mi·nem

    adjective

    (of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.

    prop·a·gan·dist Noun

    a person who promotes or publicizes a particular organization or cause.

    Which organization or cause am I promoting again? Meanwhile yours is full of anti west bullshit with terrible sources, easily disproven clickbait, and you constantly insulting anyone who dares take the 30 seconds it takes to dismantle your delusional ranting.




  • I bring her into it because she’s a native speaker and I got her translation from it. Far better than you lot doing nothing/bad ai.

    I claim people are propagandists if they do nothing but give one sided views on their comments and posts without actually reading/researching the material involved. Easy to see since comment history is a thing.

    You asked for an alternate translation- I gave one. You on the other hand have done nothing but prove my point that you don’t actually want to research anything and prefer to drink from the russia one nozzle.

    Oh also- try harder because your current amount of effort is pathetic.


  • It’s not my wife. And I can understand a bit of Russian and ukrainian

    I can go through peoples history to say people have a bias… because it’s just facts- those things you’d rather not engage with.

    And I only call out propaganda sources if they have a verifiable history of producing biased propaganda. If you aren’t one of those people with an agenda then I guess you shouldn’t be offended by it.

    Yeah- I know, it’s not the tried and true method of not researching anything and just spouting talking head/russia one but it’s the way things work.

    Try harder.











  • Yeah?

    1st) buzzfeed 2nd) the whole article is talking about the concern that the azov battalion could gain polotical/social favor by fighting for ukraine … like it did in 2014.

    Yes the above battalion was fully of extremists. . Yes right up until the annexation of crimea they had been on a downward trajectory with regard to recruitment, socio and political power. After the intial conflicts in 2014 there was a a resurgence. The us military refused to work with anyone known to have been associated with the battalion and/or far right extremism- so there was kind of a whitewashing that went on internally.

    Your war is literally the thing that is giving azov battalion more clout in Ukraine. Whereas if you’d just left it alone ukraine was on track to cleaning up corruption and extremism.

    Which is more than likely exactly why russia invaded- the country was headed towards future stability and closer relations to Europe and the west.