• 0 Posts
  • 16 Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: August 14th, 2023

help-circle
  • In a sense, money represents all the future goods and services it can buy, and those goods and services ultimately resolve down to someone’s time and effort. Money was conceived as a formalization of IOU’s, after all.

    So it’s similar to asking whether there’s a limit to how much time and effort from (i.e. influence over) others one would want.


  • I’ve heard of publishing software to design photo albums/scrapbooks/cards etc. Is there a photo collection manager for archiving, sorting and filtering?

    Given access to a large set of personal photos, say tens of thousands, it should be able to group, categorize, tag, and sort along a myriad of dimensions.

    Example dimensions would be time, people and places. It would need some facial recognition/image classifier/similarity scoring capability.

    There definitely are some cloud offerings today that do similar things, but I’d want it to work locally for privacy and practical reasons.






  • I think people are being lazy, in a selfish, tragedy of the commons sort of way.

    When standing in line, they all watch the customer stand there doing nothing as the cashier checks out items. If only they’d bag their own things, we’d all be able to get on with our lives that much sooner. Instead, they continue standing there doing nothing, as the cashier now bags their items.

    Then the next person in line moves up and also just stands there, also unwilling to do anything to help speed things along.





  • You’re getting a lot of conceptual definitions, but mechanically, it’s just:

    keeping state (data) and behavior (functions) that operate on that state, together

    At minimum, that’s it. All the other things (encapsulation, message passing, inheritance, etc) are for solidifying that concept further or for extending the paradigm with features.

    For example, you can express OOP semantics without OOP syntax:

    foo_dict.add(key, val)  # OOP syntax
    
    dict_add(foo_dict, key, val)  # OOP semantics
    


  • It’s difficult to consider them pollution even if we were to accept the subjective opinion on displeasing aesthetics.

    The pollution we’re all concerned about tends to be:

    • Physically harmful
    • Difficult to confine/localize/avoid/reverse
    • An externality the economy doesn’t sufficiently account for
    • A burden that’s unevenly/unfairly distributed across society

    Even light pollution, which is arguably barely physically harmful, has all of the remaining qualities (or nearly) for sure.

    If these qualities even apply wind generators at all, they do so very weakly. They can be moved/unbuilt, the “free market” is pricing them cheaper by the day, and if you really don’t like looking at them, it’s not impractical to avoid them.


  • Kache@lemm.eetoProgramming@programming.devGit Things
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    A title as uninformative as the single . commit messages he suggests writing.

    Bare minimums of typo, refactor, whitespace, comments are barely any effort – less than the thought it takes to name variables and functions.

    I really can’t agree with completely meaningless messages like minor and .