When I see such hardware, I directly go to see if it provides its sources. It does: https://github.com/ROCKNIX/distribution

Just a reminder that those funky hardwares are full of open source software builds (often emulators) and often does not follow the GPL licence licence and providing source code back. Things are moving in the good direction but I thinks its important for us, as user, to complain about GPL licence, specifically for such hardware that often needs updates.

This one seems pretty serious.

I like Nintendo pushing for paid-yet-good video game with events instead of micro transaction model. MTs hurt your brain.

Minetee or Craftee

I have a bad feeling about Switch performances for this. I don’t remember any non-Nintendo open world game that work fine on Switch.

Looks pretty cool. Hoping performance to be good.

First, the game is not named “Link”, now this…

Such a disappointment!

…and I still have so much cool games to play on it…

Can’t wait for the Fortnite x Mario x Starwars collab…

Despict being happy to see a new MP entry, I’m surprised by the lack difference between this and the remaster.

Unfortunately, Nintendo mobile practices are nasty.

I suspect Nintendo applied the japanese mobile scheme to global market, but its a mistake on the long run: Such practice for a company considered family-friendly can be bad, as it can trigger regulations.

Am I the only one having some concerns about a technology which organisation is going too widely high profit company dependent?

I suspect the MK8D DLC pushes the sells along the years even further. Those uncertain about buying it cross the line because, hey, hype.

I suspect Nintendo will do the same for their next MK game.

GPL is basically a contract that code will always be shared if distributed. This licence ensure any distributed library will give your code (legal standpoint).

MIT is more a use as you want licence. Devs can take the code, build and distribute binaries without restrictions.

They are not made for the same reasons. If you want to write Libre software, GPL is your friend.

As other says, rust build statically by default, having a MIT ecosystem help to spread the langage. Yet, this also mean someone can see its code used in a commercial product without sharing back, credits or counterpart.

Different uses.

Sucks less than, tradeoff, compromise, words I would love to hear more in my development days.

From here:

In January 2022, the code formatter Black saw its first non-beta release and published a new stability policy.

Not sure why it is a big deal for most things.

Close source libraries written by third party contractors in non web/internet/research related domains.

What it means is that you will always have a small portion of Python devs that will stay on Python 2.

Even if you fork it and rename it to Snake 2, you will always have devs working on a language named Python 2.

Nothing, because it’s not related to Python 3.

Free account needed.

Thanks a lot for the detailed answer.

That was my question. :)