Skellige is nice, but I prefer Toussaint:
Some pundit had a catchy phrase for this. Trump can be lawless, but Kamala has to be flawless
Bear in mind, a lot of those houses with Trump or local GOP candidate signs are put there by the husband and while many wives will follow their husband’s political leanings, at least publicly, many more will vote for the candidate who supports women’s rights.
It’s simple math: Jewish voting block > Muslim voting block
Any excuse to impose their Christo fascist agenda and put their orange fuerer on the throne
What a hilarious way to go out. Darwin Award nomination incoming
Same! One of the best first seasons of television ever
Quid pro quo. I’m shocked. Shocked I tell you.
If Iran had asked the Saudis to do it, they’d be fine.
Flag football doesn’t get as many viewers
None of those inductees are, other than Ozzy. They’ve apparently run out of actual rock musicians to add.
Nope. Just pointing out that she’s fucked herself long term with this frivolous lawsuit, so not only is she an asshole, she also didn’t think through how bringing this lawsuit would make her look to her future potential employers. That kind of short sighted thinking combined with being an asshole might need some further evaluation.
How was this not elevated to a hate crime? That sentance is weak sauce for a racially motivated attack
The other side of this coin which drives me nuts is when the GOP representatives who vote against things like the Infrastructure Act then claim credit for the money and projects being done in their districts. Bitch, you can’t vote against something then take credit for it when it benefits you! Two faced fuckers, every single one of them