• 0 Posts
  • 324 Comments
Joined 2 个月前
cake
Cake day: 2024年7月12日

help-circle

  • SSJMarx@lemm.eetoPolitical Memes@lemmy.worldRed-painted fascists never change
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    15 小时前

    Famously, the Spartacus Uprising was definitely a democratic movement and not an attempt to seize the government by force before democratic elections could be held. /s

    There was a general strike! Millions of people participated! It failed in large part because the Communists weren’t ready for it and their leadership was too paralyzed in the moment to actually seize power!

    But please continue to just imagine what historical events were like instead of picking up a book and learning about them.








  • SSJMarx@lemm.eetoPolitical Memes@lemmy.worldRed-painted fascists never change
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    18 小时前

    which had previously been cooperative with the KPD after the establishment of the Weimar Republic.

    Famously the SPD didn’t work together with fascists to create the kill squads that murdered Rosa Luxemburg.

    To reiterate what I said the last time centrists acted revisionist about this shit, nobody in history has been more vindicated than Ernst motherfucking Thalmann. Social Democrats are objectively the moderate wing of fascism and they enthusiastically participated in suppressing everyone to the left of them until there was nobody left and the Nazis decided it was their turn.




  • SSJMarx@lemm.eetoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldWhat. the. hell?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 天前

    Not really.

    The fundamental critique of capitalism is that not even the capitalists are really in charge. Marx lays out quite thoroughly in Capital that the profit motive is what’s actually in charge, and the capitalists are just along for the ride, and that any attempt by the capitalists to flex their power in a way that the market cannot abide will result in them losing their privileged status and being replaced by a different capitalist who will better serve the needs of the profit motive.

    By contrast, socialist systems are run by people. That makes them flexible and able to serve the needs of society in a way that capitalist societies simply aren’t. And yes, people are capable of mistakes, failure, and betrayal; but so too are they capable of insight, success, and solidarity. The best of existing socialist societies past and present is when they buck the demands of the market and provide for their people in ways that capitalist societies don’t, and the worst of socialist societies is invariably the things that they are required to do in order to maintain their existence on a predominantly capitalist world.



  • SSJMarx@lemm.eetoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldWhat. the. hell?
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 天前

    Americans live in one of the police states of all time. Capitalism can only produce this result, there is no alternative, because the ruling class knows just as well as the socialists do that the contradictions will only keep getting worse and the protests will only keep getting bigger but of course instead of wanting to change the equation to produce a different result like the socialists do the capitalists want to cling to power by any means necessary.



  • SSJMarx@lemm.eetomemes@lemmy.worldI think he couldn't
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    2 天前

    Your characters walk into a magic shop, but instead of buying magic items the shopkeeper offers to sell them scrolls of ownership. “There are infinite number of these scrolls,” he explains, “but they all use a decentralized mechanism to determine ownership!”

    “Okay, I’ll buy one. Now where’s my +1 sword?” The fighter asks.

    “The scrolls say that you own it” the shopkeeper unhelpfully reiterates. “And every other scroll will be updated to agree that you own it.”




  • SSJMarx@lemm.eetoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldRafah
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 天前

    Those are the rules when you’re occupied by a foreign military. Imagine if Russia had control over all of Ukraine - people in occupied Kyiv would be justified in attacking Russia, but Russia would not be justified in retaliating against the Ukrainians.

    If Israel wants to make it so that the Palestinians don’t have every right to retaliate against them, they would have to end the occupation, the blockade, the settlements, etc.


  • SSJMarx@lemm.eetoMicroblog Memes@lemmy.worldRafah
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 天前

    I think they assumed that Israel wouldn’t be so bloodthirsty as to put the hostages at risk, which would give them a bargaining position so that once they weathered the initial retaliation they would be able to get concessions such as allowing Palestinians to leave Gaza, ending the blockade of Gaza’s ports, ending Israeli control of Gazan water sources, etc.

    But as we’ve all learned since then the IDF has an explicit policy to kill Israeli civilians if it looks like they’re about to be captured, and Israel’s political leadership simply aren’t put off by the possibility of killing every single remaining hostage in their campaign to flatten Gaza.