Alt. Profile @Th4tGuyII

  • 0 Posts
  • 301 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 10th, 2023

help-circle




  • Exactly. The big problem with LLMs is that they’re so good at mimicking understanding that people forget that they don’t actually have understanding of anything beyond language itself.

    The thing they excel at, and should be used for, is exactly what you say - a natural language interface between humans and software.

    Like in your example, an LLM doesn’t know what a cat is, but it knows what words describe a cat based on training data - and for a search engine, that’s all you need.










  • That may be their objective, but they’ve clearly failed and should be rewritten to reflect reality, evidenced by the fact that half of scientific journals use Aluminum.

    Once again - American journals.
    You’re downright ignorant to suggest that because one country refuses to follow an internationally agreed upon naming scheme it should be rewritten to suit you. That’s the kind of logic that should come from a little kid, not a country.

    Of course if you’d like to stick entirely with the academic prescriptions, you’re free to not use “email” in French, singular they in English, AI instead of KI in Norwegian […]

    I don’t have enough context about all the examples you list to make an informed opinion of them, but I can certainly take a crack at a couple…

    singular they in English

    Singular they was historically discouraged in academic writing as it was seen as informal, but doesn’t mean it was never acknowledged.
    It has been used, just not widely - though with an academic swing towards gender-neutral language, it is seen as acceptable by most academic style guides…
    However, in the scientific world you’re not really supposed to refer to yourself personally in papers in the first place, so it’s about as accepted as any other pronoun.

    AI instead of KI in Norwegian

    That’s not just a Norwegian thing, it’s a difference due to language.
    AI is not an internationally standardised terminology, so of course different languages with different component words and/or grammar are going to end up with different acronyms.

    For example, the Germans and Dutch also refer to it as KI (though in Dutch AI is also acceptable), and in Spain and France IA is the standard - that doesn’t mean that academics wouldn’t just agree on a term when working internationally.

    As said before, I don’t know enough about the other examples to make informed discussion of them, but the examples I do have context for are do not fall in the same category as America outright refusing to use internationally agreed upon terminology.

    In any case, I don’t think you’re going to be convinced by any of the words I’m saying, nor do I think I’ll be convinced by anything you could say, so I’m going to leave this here before I throw too much time into an endless back and forth.


  • Th4tGuyII@kbin.socialtoGreentext@sh.itjust.worksAnon hates aluminum
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ah of course, the heavily American-centric forum is obviously the perfect way to prove the entirely American misspelling is the correct one /s

    You can spell or pronounce Aluminium however you like, but there is only one internationally recognised spelling, and it’s not “Aluminum”

    Those “archaic rules” exist to standardise international science communication, not to make America feel better about its inability to standardise to save its life.


  • Th4tGuyII@kbin.socialtoGreentext@sh.itjust.worksAnon hates aluminum
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    Oh, really?

    The official IUPAC spelling is “Aluminium” - notice how there are two "I"s in there.

    Since IUPAC is quite literally the international authority on chemical terminology, I’d suggest their spelling is the correct one.

    If you want to spell it wrong, you do you, but don’t act like it’s the correct way to spell it.




  • Exactly. People weren’t so much amazed by the fact something wouldn’t move until you moved it, they were much more amazed by mathematical proof that in the vacuum of space objects will just keep moving however you pushed them - it’s an alien idea when all you’ve ever experienced is the opposite on Earth.