AI, at it again.
AI, at it again.
I mean, why not both?
My dumb brain was too busy trying to make a joke about irrational numbers to not even notice one had been made for me.
Nah, that’s a natural number. An irrational lead would be if he lead by π or something like that.
Soon-to-be former doctor.
But I doubt that will make him regret what he did. He’ll probably blame the “woke leftists” for “silencing him”.
The final hilarity would be Elon forcing Twitter to re-enable SMS based tweets, then hackers using it to fake tweets from Elon himself.
It’s one happy meal, Ellen. What could it cost, $25?
That way, in a few years, they can announce a bigger commitment for positive PR that they have no intention of keeping.
“Corporate commitments to environmental problems turn out to just be fluff for positive PR”
Really need to start taxing wealth, and not just income.
Someone told them the problem was just “too many variables”, so they figured by taking away sensors, there are fewer variables. Therefore, better self-driving.
It’s still nowhere near any standard we should expect to trust this technology, which is a flawed solution to a problem that doesn’t really exist.
I believe a huge chunk of Tesla’s valuation is based on their automation tech, despite having very little real success towards full automation. So they have to focus on that and try to prove they can deliver.
But I’m guessing they won’t succeed, as there are fundamental flaws with the technology itself, that can’t be solved by throwing more sensors at the problem.
Switched to Fedora at the beginning of the year and couldn’t be happier.
The majority of my time isn’t spent writing code; it’s reading code, reviewing changes, and thinking about code.
It doesn’t actually need to make money at the moment, just drive value for shareholders.
Nothing can justify genocide.
If you ask them to respond like a politician they answer all your questions with something completely different.
Uh oh, you’ve awakened the crypto bros…
Fuck you, Jeff.