I once met a person that never drank water, only soft drinks. It’s not the unhealthiness of this that disturbed me, but the fact they did it without the requisite paperwork.

Unlike those disorganised people I have a formal waiver. I primarily drink steam and crushed glaciers.

  • 5 Posts
  • 157 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2023

help-circle

  • Sorry to hear you’re feeling crap.

    I’m having trouble looking for work for the past few months. Very few replies, the first “no” I got actually made me feel a bit more human.

    I’m convinced that some of the jobs I’ve applied for or enquired about are not real or just for external-advertising-before-hire requirements. I’ve gotten some rude responses after daring to ask questions (eg: jobs funded by research money tend to have fixed funding start dates that might not be for another several months). Most straight up ignore me.

    An old boss of mine thinks that my CV isn’t conforming and mundane enough, so I’m giving his suggestions a go.

    What sort of work are you looking at? I design electronics and get into arguments with computers.













  • The one real risk is that it’s a respiratory depressant and that it’s LD 50 is only a few tens of times a standard dose

    The article claims it’s much closer than that:

    Experts and festival-goers agreed on the likely cause of GHB’s disproportionate overdose burden.

    “As little as 1 millilitre difference can tip you from what you’re looking for to what you’re not looking for,” Daniel Fatovich, chief investigator of EDNA, told Hack.

    I tried to find some stuff to back this up. The “therapeutic index” is probably what I’m after (ratio of effective dose to dangerous dose), despite this technically not being a therapeutic use.

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8843350/ - The narrow therapeutic index of GHB renders its use hazardous with poisoning or toxicity not uncommon with small titration of doses.

    Thats… annoyingly nonspecific. A number for the T.I. would be a good educational tool.

    This paper claims its around 5:1 to 8:1:

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4462042/ - Mortality rates after abuse of GHB are high, because there is only a narrow safety margin between a recreational dose and a fatal dose, which is only 5:1 to 8:1 [4-8]. Accordingly, accidental poisoning after recreational use of GHB is not uncommon as evidenced by admissions to hospital emergency departments for treatment [9, 10] and during forensic medical investigations of drug intoxication deaths [11-14].

    Someone else in the comments here mentioned that the recreational dosage for different individuals varies, if that’s true then it could make this worse.

    polydrug using who get hurt […] education if we want to save lives

    Agreed. Most people don’t understand what’s in pills they have bought or the interactions with alcohol.


  • SAAS isn’t a one-off purchase, it’s a rental with ongoing rental fees.

    The intention of the wording of the petition is that it only covers “purchased” items. If a customer is given the impression that they are buying something then it should act like any other bought item. If they are given the impression they are renting something then it’s out of scope, that’s expected to abruptly die one day.

    effectively withdrawing customers’ rights under the Australian Consumer Law to ownership and undisturbed possession of their purchased goods

    ^ it’s a bit subtle if you’re not familiar with the campaigns’ language.

    This means other people will misinterpret it too :(







  • There have been constant news articles coming out over the past few years claiming the next big thing in supercapacitor and battery technologies. Very few actually turn out to work practically.

    The most exciting things to happen in the last few years (from an average citizen’s perspective) are the wider availability of sodium ion batteries (I believe some power tools ship with them now?), the continued testing of liquid flow batteries (endless trials starting with the claim that they might be more economic) and the reduction in costs of lithium-ion solid state batteries (probably due to the economics of electric car demand).

    FWIW the distinction between capacitors and batteries gets blurred in the supercapacitor realm. Many of the items sold or researched are blends of chemical (“battery”) and electrostatic (“capacitor”) energy storage. The headline of this particular pushes the misconception that these concepts can’t mix.

    My university login no longer works so I can’t get a copy of the paper itself :( But from the abstract it looks first stage, far from getting excited about:

    This precise control over relaxation time holds promise for a wide array of applications and has the potential to accelerate the development of highly efficient energy storage systems.

    “holds promise” and “has the potential” are not miscible with “May Be the Beginning of the End for Batteries”.