Oof! That’s rough. With a full shop you Could build it from scratch in half the time. Can’t beat the price, though…
Oof! That’s rough. With a full shop you Could build it from scratch in half the time. Can’t beat the price, though…
You can double up the handles, which also spreads the load a bit so they don’t cut into your hand as much. It is mainly for compactness and easy marketing
Pretty straightforward leaves some room for ambiguity. You’re a pion until you decide you aren’t
Generally I would agree, and give them the benefit of the doubt, but it smells too fishy. A lot of goodwill was pumped up during testflight, but went dead very soon after money got involved, almost a full 180 and with barely a word afterwards. For all intents and purposes they still took the money and ran
Thanks. I reported it too. I have written off the money, but the principle remains. Scammers will keep scamming and should be squashed.
Supergreen
I am skeptical and don’t expect much. At this point I have all but written off my lifetime membership. In retrospect, it was rather suspicious how quickly went from TestFlight to full release. Communication was almost insulting. Shit happens, but informing as setbacks happen (however brief) garners so much more goodwill than going silent and then posting an apology, especially if you let someone else do it and even more so right after starting to charge for features that were previously free on an app that while looking polished had serious issues with stability and memory leaks
Regardless of the circumstances and events, this way of doing things completely destroys credibility and trust in the future of the product and the developer.
I really want it to succeed and hope the developer really puts in sufficient remedial action to somewhat mend the damage done, but at this point I am not holding much hope for little more than the bare minimum, if anything
In space, yesterday’s coffee is tomorrow’s coffee