Materialism really does lend itself to anti-intellectuals who think they’re so smart, doesn’t it?
this just ad hominem. it doesn’t change the truth of what i’ve said at all.
Materialism really does lend itself to anti-intellectuals who think they’re so smart, doesn’t it?
this just ad hominem. it doesn’t change the truth of what i’ve said at all.
you commies are all so predictable smh
am i a commie or a conservative? this is incoherent.
Go ahead and claim I’ve committed another formal fallacy on an informal discussio
i’m pretty sure all the fallacies i’ve called out are informal.
Because you don’t have a position
i do, and i’ve said it plainly, repeatedly: being vegan doesn’t help. each year the animal agriculture industry grows, despite the existence of vegans.
bad-faith conservative you are
baby, i’m an anarchist. it’s bad faith to tell people what their politics are instead of believing them.
Link literally any source that backs your conservative, status-quo reinforcing position,
i don’t need a source. you have claimed that being vegan is better. it’s up to you to show that is the case.
You’re arguing from a position of complete nonsense, and it’s not an “appeal to ridicule” to call out bad logic and sealioning tactics.
your accusation of sealioning is bad faith
“The vast majority of people are not communist, therefore communism wouldn’t be better for workers.”
“The world isn’t powered by renewables, therefore renewables aren’t better than coal.”
“Things aren’t currently better, so no change would make it better.”
none of these accurately characterize my position
I pointed out the flaws in your point and your “argument” was that since no one is vegan, veganism isn’t better for the environment.
that’s not what i said.
That’s true, because what you said holds no truth at all.
what i said is true or it is not.
You’ve said nothing except for flat denial and asserting illogical nonsense lol
if that were the case, you could show the flaw in my logic. tagging on your appeal to ridicule and poisoning the well indicates an inability or unwillingness to engage in good faith.
Go back to talking about…
this, too, does not change the truth of what i’ve said, nor bolstered your own claims
calling me a troll (and saying that i haven’t made any strong claims), doesn’t change the truth of anything i’ve said nor bolster your own claims.
this reads like 5 non-sequiturs.
this is an appeal to ridicule. it is not a rebuttal.
it hasn’t decreased the industrys impact yet
I want a better system, but I don’t believe buying beans helps me get there
I don’t recall in particular, but even if he did, you are making a leap to claim he was working for Russia or trump
going great, thanks!
ever heard the term “blue maga”?