I’m clumsy enough that I’ve got a “paper cut” from aluminum foil while preparing dinner.
I’m clumsy enough that I’ve got a “paper cut” from aluminum foil while preparing dinner.
I’ve tried using SFC multiple times and had it work zero times. One time after SFC failed to find anything wrong, I ended up fixing the machine by replacing the system file with a copy from a working machine.
I let one of mine expire a few years ago. Finally decided I wanted to try to register it again, but a squatter is now sitting on it asking for something like $10k $3.6k.
Edit: just double-checked, they lowered the price to only $3595!
For someone who likes to think of himself as a modern Nikola Tesla, he acts much more like Edison.
But, don’t you see? His idea works in a vacuum!
I mean, it basically is a poop knife that can reach further down inside the toilet.
Yeah, I’ve had to help a neighbor with that 1 time out of 100. The plunger was just causing the water to slam against the turd that had created a perfect seal and splash back outside the toilet. It probably took at least 5 uses with the auger to finally clear out enough crap to finally break it apart enough to let it flush.
Fortunately, the second time I helped them with a nearly identical situation, the plunger worked. But it still took a few forceful plunges in quick succession. I was worried I might have to use the auger again.
If Democrats are ever lucky enough to get 2/3rds of the Senate (and 51% of the House), at that point the Supreme Court might start to think twice about their decisions.
Edit: unfortunately unlikely, though
The UN would likely consider it a violation of their human rights if a country knowingly allowed a citizen to become stateless. I would hope that at least all member states would not allow it, but I don’t know for certain.
moral improves
Not sure if that was intentional, but I suppose it’s technically correct.
You can be popular without being intelligent.
Maybe impartial information more than disinformation. It’s still likely the responses from late Saturday and Sunday would have impacted the percentage by at least 1 or 2 points. The fact it stayed the same hopefully means that at best it simply prevented Biden from taking the lead.
SRP, but they only operate in Phoenix, AZ.
My average bill is $350, with summer months reaching ~$650. But, I have 3100 sq feet with 7 people at home and 2 EVs. Including monthly service fees, my per kWh cost works out to 11.9 cents.
She did lose because she moved a little bit left and the voters did not show up.
We’re saying you don’t understand cause and effect.
You are saying A (moving left) caused B (losing).
If A didn’t happen, then B also would not have happened. Therefore, “if she had stayed to the right, she would have won.”
Edit: I think I figured out what I’ve got wrong. If I rephrase what you said, then it makes more sense:
“She did lose because the voters did not show up, even though she moved a little left.”
https://www.grammarly.com/blog/despite-in-spite-of/
I feel you are misinterpreting what I’m trying to say, this example would be more accurate:
“The far left wing wanted Hillary to move far left. But they protested anyway despite her moving a little bit left.”
I still think this has been a useful conversion, because it has helped me understand what you actually meant to say.
What I think you’re trying to say is that moving left failed to prevent voters from protesting, which I’m completely in agreement here.
If courting left wing voters fails to get them out to vote, then politicians are just going to pander to center/right voters.
Your phrasing was just really weird, because you keep arguing that moving left is what triggered the voters to protest, but they would have protested either way.
Are you saying that if Hillary had rejected the map room proposal, then left wing voters would have turned out to vote for her?
That’s ridiculous to think that moving further right would have got more left voters to turn out to vote.
Meaning the map room proposal had no effect on left wing voters, because it wasn’t enough. It did not cause them to protest.
No, they protested in spite of her trying to move left, not because she tried to move left.
Although I’ll admit it’s a distinction without a difference. Democrats are going to continue to refuse to move farther left if we don’t vote because we think they’re not left enough.
Does your lemmy app let you zoom images at all? Or is it still too small when you do?