• 0 Posts
  • 578 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 26th, 2023

help-circle
  • fishos@lemmy.worldtoPeople Twitter@sh.itjust.worksSo many
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    It’s really quite simple and doesn’t take a novel to understand.

    When the audience is given all the same information as the characters and are trying to solve it at the same time as the characters, it’s a plot driven mystery.

    When characters already know the answer and the audience is kept in the dark(especially with editing/cuts) until the last episode of the season, it’s mystery for mystery sake. If the plot can’t exist without intentionally keeping facts from the audience, it’s mystery for mystery.

    There’s no harm in being Oceans 11. But don’t pretend this is something it’s not.

    And just gotta say “man wants to rescue wife” is the most reductionist take on the plot and shows why you find what little that was there as satisfying. The “plot” is about a cult like company that does an insane medical procedure on its employees, and part of the plot is that they did it to a couple and reunited them. At least, that’s what we’re hunted at. It’s also about all we’re actually given.


  • fishos@lemmy.worldtoPeople Twitter@sh.itjust.worksSo many
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    26 days ago

    That doesn’t change what OP said. It’s still keeping up mystery for mystery sake. But if you want to nitpick, fine. Helena being “in or out” in the first few episodes was mystery for mystery sake too. The “mystery” is largely being lied too/kept in the dark, not being given a satisfying riddle.

    If the mystery only exists because you deny the audience information the characters know, it’s not a mystery. It’s just slow lying.


  • fishos@lemmy.worldtoPeople Twitter@sh.itjust.worksSo many
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    26 days ago

    Except that Harbor was a known thing by several characters but we are intentionally kept in the dark for the sake of the plot. It was only a mystery to the innies and the audience. But since a large portion of the cast are executive outies, yes, it was mystery for the sake of the plot.
















  • fishos@lemmy.worldtoFuck AI@lemmy.worldFuck AI with "Fuck"
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Whooooosh

    If the AI summary is incorrect, then his point about trusting AI is incorrect. If the AI summary is correct, then it contradicts what he said the definition is and he is once again incorrect. Literally, no matter what, he’s wrong. It’s was a fun way to show the absurdity of blindly trusting AI. His logic itself is flawed.



  • fishos@lemmy.worldtoFuck AI@lemmy.worldFuck AI with "Fuck"
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Yeah no. Just had someone IRL try to use the AI summary to prove something that was blatantly false.

    Even more fitting: factoid means something believed to be true, but is false. It’s not a “cute little tidbit of info” like you used it as.

    So yeah, AI summaries are full of factoids, you are correct.