If it kills your cells, it can’t be bad, right?

Reminds me of this website happily reporting that you should eat curcuma because curcumin was shown (?) to be a possible cellular anti-proliferating… 🤦

I tried Windows ToGo on a few USB keys (including two high-speed ones), never managed to get something I could actually use that was not laggy AF, to the point it’s not usable (dozens of minutes to boot, lags of entire minutes and so on). Did I do something wrong?

@[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected]

After exploring all solutions, and fighting a few things to build either Hawck or Espanso on openSUSE (I’m not a dev), I finally managed to find instructions to get Espanso to build (it’s all there, fellow desperate random reader of the future). Since you can define the keyboard layout AND the variant of said keyboard you are using with Espanso, it’s working as expected.

So now, I’ve associated “:$” with “|>”, not sure how well that’ll work in the future, but it’s far easier to type on my keyboard at least… Also, I gained a tool to insert greek symbols and smileys everywhere that I didn’t know I needed, but very quickly adopting! 😅

Thanks all for your help!

Hm, I don’t think it works, because as far as I understand, wl-paste is outputting the content of clipboard into stdout, not actually “pasting” the content (or at least, I can’t make it paste something outside of stdout, maybe I’m being thick).

Interesting take! Worth a shot!

Looks interesting. I’m not entirely sure it can output two keys since it’s a remapper, but I’ll dig into more details tomorrow, thanks!

Seems interesting. I’m happy if it works with just as a text replacement. Seems a bit of a pain to install though! 😅

I’ll have a look in more details tomorrow! Cheers!

Yeah, I tried this way, but due to the issue with keyboard layout, ydotool does not output |>, but some gibberish instead. I couldn’t reverse-engineer how to make it output a proper |>.

There’s now a separated luminosity applet that will change brightness if you scroll on it (normally, didn’t check, I’m on my phone).

There’s a desktop edition of OnlyOffice FYI.

I love Linux Libertine. An excellent font for professional looking documents!

Possibly a bug? I can’t reproduce, the panel is keeping the custom size I set it to when I quite and restart Kmail.

Not particularly security savvy, but :

The infected devices then attempt to crack the telnet password by guessing default and commonly used credential pairs.

My understanding is that the worm is targetting connected devices with supidly simple credentials, which is why “Internet-of-Things” is mentioned?

I raise to you the current version of openSUSE Tumbleweed: 20240108! I think we’ve got the winner…

Not only mutations, genetic drift as well, which by definition, happens purely at random. But yes!

This article was posted a few days ago FYI.

Thanks! I found something interesting, a function named icalfilter from the ical2html package in Debian/Ubuntu. Very easy to use to filter by categories. Unfortunately, this same package does not exist for openSUSE, but worse case scenario, I can use my Debian server to work on those ICS files.

I see better where your questions are coming from, thank you. I think the fundamental answer to your question then is that while Darwin was inspired by the writings for Malthus, it would be a strong exaggeration to state that it is based on Malthus theory. More precisely, Darwin used the concepts of exponential growth (though he might not have used that term) and ressource limitations, but applied it to wild populations and concluded very different things from Malthus. Basically, the idea is that ressource limitations would exacerbate the differential reproduction between individuals due to their characteristics (which leads to Natural Selection).

Thus, you can perfectly reject the conclusions of Malthus, especially the political side of what he wrote about Human societies, and conserve the Theory of Evolution.

Darwin was clearly a product of the Victorian high society, and this would have influenced quite a lot its way of thinking and the way he framed the theory (this is well-documented), but it does not mean that the theory itself is politically loaded nowadays. It’s been quite refined beyond the writings of Darwin, including by people clearly from the left side of the political board (e.g. Haldane).

Not really, no. In a sense, never has been. “Survival of the fittest” was a poor formula (I remember reading that Darwin was not fond of it at first and used it somewhat reluctantly but I can’t remember where), and a very bad summary of the theory of evolution. To start with because the important thing is differential reproduction (with modifications) between individuals, but not survival per se. But also because natural selection is just a part of the modern theory and many others aspects have been added since then (mutations, drift, phenotypic plasticity, environmental inheritance, etc).