Knedliky

Step 1: politicians must pay for their own legal troubles

Step 2: “The Association of Totally Real Concerned Citizens” starts filing lawsuits across the country

Step 3: any non-billionaire elected to a political office is bankrupted within a year

Step 4: surprised yellow rodent face

(Bonus step 5: JB Pritzker becomes president and solves world hunger with deep dish pizza)

Edit: line breaks

Maybe it’s “Lichtjahr”? So as long as you stay within 3*10^15km of earth you should be fine 👍

Maybe this research and language is intended to suggest that there is a point past which “confusingly and unintuitively designed” strongly resembles “intentionally deceiving”? We’re probably not going to get internal emails saying “make it complicated so that we can collect users’ data”.

Also, researchers don’t really control how university press departments write up their results. Even less so when they’re interviewed by media.

Addendum: Apple takes great pride in UI and user-centered design, and lately they have been highlighting privacy as a differentiator from Android. Maybe they just dropped the ball, maybe people don’t care, maybe people aren’t very bright. Still, some people have questions:)

Nostalgieglückstränen, nehme ich an. Ne? NE?!

JÄGERSCHNITZEL. ifykyk.

Where I’m from you can enjoy some pork with boiled cabbage and potatoes or some nice potato stew with cabbage and lard or cabbage stuffed with minced pork (with potatoes) or, if it’s late in winter, some pickled cabbage with salted pork. And potatoes.

Thank you for recommending this. I was one of today’s lucky ten thousand 🥳

The linked version in stable was not impacted.

Relativ klassische Polemik gegen die Definition von Armut als X% des Medians. Gerne erweitert um „Arbeitslose haben heutzutage ein Smartphone und können Vanille und Zimt im Supermarkt kaufen. Ludwig der 14. hat nicht so gut gelebt!“ Sprich, die wahre richtige Definition der Armut sollte sein „besitzt die Kleider, die er trägt und sonst nichts und ist permanent an der Grenze zum Kaloriendefizit“.

You’re assuming good faith and willingness to learn/change in the part of the students. I was a TA at a private US uni for the not so smart kids of rich parents. Our approach (imposed by admin) was all carrots all the time. 20% seems fair, even low, for the share of students who were there to get a degree with the least amount of effort necessary and then get a job thanks to the uni’s name and their connections.

Most people have asymmetric faces. It’s wild when you pay attention to it. Like somebody put two different halves together and went “sure that kinda works.”

Germany uses paper ballots. 60 million eligible voters, 3/4 actually voted during the last federal elections.

Removed by mod

“WOLLT IHR DEN TOTALEN KRIEG? … Hey, not like that! Not fair!”

Woooooooooooosh

I suggest googling reproducibility/replication crisis or Francesca Gino or have a look at RetractionWatch. I wish your portrait of scientists were true but alas.

Auf den Zauberstab klicken, DOI eingeben, Magieeee. Man kann es mit Word, Latex, etc. kombinieren und damit sehr einfach zitieren. Aber die richtige Magie kommt ganz am Ende, wenn Zotero die Bibliografie von alleine erstellt und formatiert. Sollte deine Unibibo ein Zotero Tutorial anbieten, kann ich das nur empfehlen.

Ok those are really big things. For those really big intimidating things, I found Barbara Oakley’s book/lectures on procrastination quite helpful. I think they are on YT. They helped me get unstuck during my PhD. For the smaller recurring things, let me know if you find a good strategy :) When it’s non-life-changing fun stuff (e.g. music/drawing/crafts), I try to focus on the joy that I get out of even just dicking around instead of how I suck compared to Picasso.

Does it have to do with the difference between one-off tasks and recurring tasks? I’ve asked myself similar questions to yours and sometimes I wonder if tedium is harder to accept when you know that, even if you finish this task today, you’ll have to do it again tomorrow, next week, etc. So why not skip it this once? (We all know it’s never just once)

deleted by creator