It should have. This is why I joined, and in fact there’s no technology reason why it shouldn’t have. The CEO et al simply did not understand that the content creator was their customer and viewed them, somehow, with disdain—despite being anti IP anarchist types, they were oxymoronic when it came to understanding who they needed to serve.

I think the best way for it to live on is as a software fork / side chain to BTC/BCH. Or you could refactor it completely against Celestia. Ethereum it wouldn’t work because the data shards demand too much and would cause L1 fee spikes.

I worked for LBRY before Odysee spin off. Worst culture from the C-Suite you could ever imagine. Autistic sociopathy is the only way to describe it.

I made a movie once with Hader that no one saw. AMA!

This is one of the craziest things I’ve ever learned.

Metro can often refer to the core city plus the suburbs in its county. So LA County more or less == LA metropolitan area; contiguous development despite there being technically multiple cities contained—LA proper, Hollywood, Studio City, Santa Monica, Beverly Hills, Venice, etc. Oklahoma City metro contains OKC, Moore, Edmond, and so on.

Jellyfin is so much better man, once setup. It’s basically the dream.

This looks so sick.

Thievery is soooo good.

Beach House circa Myth, along with TV on the Radio, M83 and Yeah Yeah Yeahs (2011 - 2014 era) were my favorite shows of all time, clustered. Good times.

EDIT: And LCD Soundsystem, that is pure fun.

If you update it will change your UI and balance so you can play online with Reforged players.

You don’t get RF but some multiplayer is playable. Some maps are RF only in rare cases.

I have RF but hate the look and always play OG graphics.

Warcraft OG isn’t playable anymore FYI. They force update legacy clients to conform to WC3 Reforged. You could only play an offline crack of the old game if you can find it, and never let it phone home.

From a certain point of view.

This might be a bit harsh, but I find them both conceptually very close to sexuality more broadly. And while sexuality makes the world go round, it is also the most boring aspect of humanity to debate—and the fact that it’s not important is precisely what makes conservatives’ strange obsession with it as well as the pop rise of genderisms the last decade in contrast, such a problem. They’re ultimately a waste of time in a world with more dire problems.

Personal preferences simply are not consequential if they don’t belong to you. And I wish everyone would move past it so things of paramount importance can have more energy spent on them.

Having said that…

I think the fact that hormone therapy and hormonal prescriptions for transitioning, both work so effectively, prove that the chemical origin of our emotional tendencies upon this “spectrum” as it were, are completely determinant of our preferences therein.

It is a fact that everyone can find within themselves pleasure in the indulgence of their own masculine or feminine qualities and experiences. Accepting that fact is more meta and a subject of one’s upbringing or lack thereof impacting the internal monologue about it.

When you love yourself, it’s all fun. :)

What country?

I guess I am not communicating well enough but you’ve summarized the real question of this definition well: is the being within, or without our universe?

If above, then there is no contradiction. If they’re within our universe proper, on “our level” then there is a contradiction that can’t exist.

The power to create and destroy universes cannot come from within this universe. Hence this debate is rendered moot, if that is the premise that they are not within our universe/physics.

And there is only a true point in this type of discussion if you’re talking about what is applicable within our known universe.

FWIW I do not believe determinism can be real in any practical sense. Even if it is provably true, it’s not actually practically applicable in anyway because it is describing an inaccessible layer of physics, to us anyway. The “layer” above our determined one would necessarily have to be non-determined to have ignited the determined “sub-reality” of ours.

I would contend that what you’re describing cannot be knowledge. Knowledge is a certainty by definition. It is “known.” Probability trees are a web of the unknown. “Knowing” the tree =/= knowing reality. Probability is not real, just as numbers are not real. They are concepts. They do not fall into the realm of known reality/experience/matter. You describing knowing that 2 + 2 = 4 conceptually. You are not describing the knowledge of the four trees in your lawn, of which there is only one instance.

I’ve not heard this way with “goodness” — I think the scientific way is that he can be omnipotent or omniscient, but not both. Their coexistence is a logical contradiction. Since omnipotence suggests a free will whereas omniscience is determinism.

Moore’s law and exponential technological progress viewed from the wider frame of biological evolution, and “the singularity,” are pretty compelling and likely upon first hearing them. They’re many nutters around it but Kurzweil earlier books on it are quite sound.

That was incredible.