As you can see from the article, the cars make it difficult to get inside and try to find survivors. They’re clogging up the entrance. That’s specific to cars.

fuck cars

Yep. When I say fuck cars, I mean fuck car infrastructure too.

I’m not being idealistic, you are. That’s idealism, it’s just extremely mediocre. You’re suffering from the belief that you can make incremental progress when you can’t. For example, if you’re American, check your rights with regards to family planning. How’s that going?

The problem is that you’re not radical enough, and the future now can only be radical, there is no more room for “middle of the road” incrementalism.

Socialism for me, but not for thee is a bad idea. It ends up like some ethno socialism. Some type of national socialism. I’ll let you figure out the rest.

How you are wrong

No.

Going into ketosis is well known in science for the increase in autophagy: fat, yes, but also muscles. It’s literally a mechanism targeted for use as therapy for certain conditions.

These ketobro clowns used to mention some traditional meat eating populations like the Inuit, but they don’t usually anymore. Yeah, those are people who “did keto” for a very long time.

The Inuit literally evolved genetic adaptation to avoid ketosis while consuming a diet high in animal fats, and they still suffer the consequences.

I’m not fucking giving up, these fuckers need to be called out for their dangerous bullshit.

Welcome to the academic precariat.

The “trad wives” (traditionalist / paleoconservative middle class women who believe that their religion is good for women) are looking for a husband in the traditional sense, a type of business owner / patriarch who owns them and provides for them; see: husbandry. That’s so that they can produce a lot of offspring while pretending that raising kids in near or full homeschooling is a good thing and she’s very successful (culturally).

They’re the homologues of incels and traditionalist bros who want to be rich so that they maintain some informal harem. And they deserve each other.

Why not?

Run

I guess you’ll learn the hard way.

Look, if you were using this extension of time to do something better, to build dual power, to corrode the foundation of the system, I’d agree with you. That’s the point of extensions, no? To get time. The destination is the same in both scenarios, but you have time in the lesser one. Are you using that time on not-you activity?

I didn’t say accelerationism. Accelerationism is a fascist position.

I’m saying that the issue here is people not realizing that,

as an analogy,

Being threatened with a gun to the head vs being threatened with a dart containing deadly radioactive oncogenic particles should be treated the same. The problem is optimism and hope, it’s what allows conservatives to play the long game.

And in terms of the strategy you hold dear, understand that capitalists and their fascist pets will bring down the whole biosphere.

Essentially, the ethics of this aren’t about “lesser evil”, they’re about how willing are you to burden the youngest generations and soon to be born with an exponentially more difficult (deadly) challenge, so you can live your life in the “normal” way and keep your head down.

Is it better? It seems like the creeping motion is much better at avoiding opposition than the double-time. Sort of like how the climate is heating just slow enough for most of the humans to think that it’s somewhat normal and usual, and the crises are somewhat normal.

Here’s some nuance: https://www.conspirituality.net/episodes/219-dems-learn-to-shitpost

When and why did the British first choose to invade India? - India Today

The British first landed in India in Surat for the purpose of trade. Here’s how and why a simple trading company, the British East India Company, became one of the biggest challenges the subcontinent had ever dealt with.

The British landed in India in Surat on August 24, 1608. While India has a rich and recorded history going back 4000 years to the Indus Valley Civilisation in Harappa and Mohenjo-Daro, Britain had no indigenous written language until the 9th century almost 3000 years after India. Then how was it possible for the British to start capturing this huge country and control it from 1757 to 1947?

Traditionalists is the usual term. Paleoconservatives is also a known term.

I think some call it “guyliner”.

Since he’s doing it, he knows. It’s probably best to gloss over it. I expect that he wants to tell some “war stories” about wearing eyeliner in the Iraqi desert or something like that.

Hello, fellow AntennaPod user.