Others mentioned good sources.

I like to install in Lutris.

If the game is not a Steam exclusive, you can get some help from Lutris-scripts, and if the game is a bit older, maybe even winehq appdb. Otherwise, ProtonDB (if the game doesn’t run but the recent reviews say to just hit play, look for older reviews).

Most of the time, the issue will be .NET or vcrun (Majorgeeks AIO is easier than winetricks IMO)

Barely had issues wich FG yet. She even has instructions for Linux. Limit to 2GB RAM works almost always.

I had one game where I had to use the Lutris 7.2 runner and I had a diyferent game where a feature would only work with Proton.

Newer Codex cracks don’t work.

https://youtu.be/PmCLeTqD4hY?t=35

I remember reading some articles saying that they backtracked.

I can’t judge how careful the people saying “Audacity is evil” are regarding privacy. I’m not saying you’re wrong, I’m just interested in your thoughts.

MuseScore is owned by the same company, Firefox is worse (as the article mentions)… Do you not use either of these? Do you use one of these but not Audacity? If the second one applies to someone, what would be the reason? As a matter of principle? Something else?

(I mean, I don’t know of a FOSS alternative to MuseScore.)

LG ist noch sammelfreudiger mit Screenshots alle 10 Millisekunden.

Das kommt mir seltsam vor. Bei 60 FPS wechselt das Bild alle 16+(2/3) Millisekunden. Wieso öfter als das?

(Der in diesem Beispiel angenommene Fernseher kann nur 60 FPS, was wahrscheinlich auf die meisten existierenden Modelle zutrifft.)

Aber das lässt sich doch nicht vermarkten!

Here’s what Signal says: https://signal.org/blog/contact-discovery/

Signal knows all of their users’ phone numbers.

Only the hash of your phone number.

Info-Kommentar, in Österreich ist es im Moment für Leute unter 30 gratis.

Genuine question, how precise do you need the time to be? Maybe you actually need precise readings for something. I figured that “on the 5 min marker”, “slightly before/behind the 5 min marker” and “in the middle of two 5 min markers” is precise enough for me. And I see a hand at these positions faster than reading numbers.

I think for precise readings (eg. entering the time I start working), the speed is the same for me, but obviously I didn’t test this.

I also think looking at the time but still not knowing what time it is a few seconds later happens less on an analog clock.

I don’t know how much personal preference influences this though.