Brings that whole Clint Eastwood “Get off my lawn” vibe to another level.

After that first attack by Israel, my thought was the act was a “trade” with the US.

We’ll be entirely hands off re Gaza & keep funding you, but you need to deal with some things in Iran for us.

This fits that theory.

This makes the most sense.

Why is everyone so hands off and permissive with Israel? Like they can do nothing wrong when they go out of their way to do wrong things?

Common sense. And it will fail because it is common sense.

Mass Effect recycled many names from science. I hadn’t realized Garneau was one of them until now. (Leviathan expansion, ME3).

Adult doesn’t necessarily mean smart, mature, or emotionally healthy.

Didn’t Theil explain this was the goal in an often repeated vid, I forget from where, he’s speaking at a podium though.

Didn’t Netflix cover this in a food special 5 years ago? That and Tiger King.

This belongs on T shirts and beer cozies.

People insisting trickle down economics worked, when, in fact, it tricked up into the pockets of Bezos and the Waltons.

The surgeon who performs illegal organ transplants.

The Onion is a little too close these days.

I wouldn’t be surprised if the west coast didn’t try to peel off, together. Texas is sticking around, for now.

HarmonQuest.

I don’t understand open relationships, but in that scenario, there’s trust and agreement.

The men who throw out this biological, primate imperative argument without that relationship contract are just jerks. Breakers of people and trust.

There are people who agree not to be monogamous, but as it’s within the relationship contract, so to speak, it remains a relationship. I don’t personally understand it, but I don’t have to. We have two couples who are friends, via history, married right out of high school, who’ve lived like this for decades. It works for them because they’re honest and open about it, and it’s mutually agreed upon.

Any deviation from the honest, open, discussed, and mutually agreed upon, and you’re little more than a destructive asshole.

One is cheating and the other is not.

I agree. But you can’t squeeze blood from a rock.

If you want narrow readership. Or a society that bases its current events knowledge almost strictly on headlines instead of article content.

People can’t afford groceries. Rent. There is a profound increase in garbage both along highways and in rural locations because it’s the first utility to be sacrificed in the name of survival.

Paying $x per month to dig deeper in on a headline, while the above is happening, isn’t going to occur on any grand scale.

That’s fair, what’s not fair is Word and other such basics engaging this model.