Keep noticing that when taking about Linux distro recommendations (on Reddit) users recommend Mint and Ubuntu for gaming.

Now don’t get me wrong, they’re great distros and with a bit of work are great for games, but I feel like theres better recommendations for new users looking into getting into gaming on linux.

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The reason for Ubuntu is that it’s the distro corporations (like Valve and AMD) are most likely to officially support.

  • Hucklebee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ve been usung mint for about a month now.

    I want to get rid of Windows, but I don’t want to spend my day sudo-ing my ass off.

    Give me a gui for everything and doubleclick installers, and a release that is stable above all else.

    I’m open to suggestions though! So shoot away which distro I should be using :)

    My nephew uses arch btw.

  • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    There are better “gaming” distros, but unless someone uses their PC exclusively for gaming, when it comes time to install other kinds of software for school or work or whatever, they’re going to get thrown in the deep ends of Linux.

    But guess what does have two decades of software and tutorials to set up just about everything in existence? Ubuntu, and by extension Mint.

    Sure you can squeeze more out of your games with something like Bazzite, but the general platform that anything Linux-native targets is usually Ubuntu. Sure there’s distrobox and stuff that’s like telling the average gamer to go set up WSL. It’s not hard per-se but the amount of things to learn increases very quickly.

    Thus, even though Ubuntu is very average these days, it’s still a safe bet for new users.

  • enleeten@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Ubuntu is the most popular and common distro

    OEM vendors primarily use it as their reference distro when testing and supporting drivers, hardware, applications, games, etc.

    It’s the path of least resistance.

  • CatZoomies@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Microsoft has been radicalizing me more and more these days.

    I have an i7-12700k and an RTX 3080. I heard Nvidia is tricky because of drivers, but any issues with using intel CPUs with Linux?

    Where should I, a complete noob, begin? I’m intermediately technical, moderate/semi-intermediate with command line, etc. Is Mint the best way to go?

    I tried pop_OS! a few years ago but my computer couldn’t run it well for some reason - lots of lag despite having an i7 7700k at the time and installing it on a separate spare SSD. Reinstalled it twice but still had issues with noticeable lag in the OS. My specs were great, but that OS turned me off unless it has substantially improved since then.

      • folkrav@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Pop is basically Ubuntu minus snap, plus flatpak, plus their PPA, no?

        • bjorney@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Yes. With a custom gnome shell fork.

          Their summer release will have the new desktop environment they have been working on (Cosmic) which will be a big point of differentiation