vegeta@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · edit-25 months agoSupreme Court rejects bid to restrict access to abortion pillwww.nbcnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square40fedilinkarrow-up1404arrow-down12file-text
arrow-up1402arrow-down1external-linkSupreme Court rejects bid to restrict access to abortion pillwww.nbcnews.comvegeta@lemmy.world to News@lemmy.world · edit-25 months agomessage-square40fedilinkfile-text
minus-squarefrezik@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up3·5 months agoThey voted that the case is obviously lacking on technical grounds of standing. That’s not the same as voting to protect access. They just want a better set of plaintiffs.
minus-squareNotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·5 months ago“Our corruption to the core would be too obvious if we heard this case”
They voted that the case is obviously lacking on technical grounds of standing. That’s not the same as voting to protect access. They just want a better set of plaintiffs.
“Our corruption to the core would be too obvious if we heard this case”