Dr. Coomer@lemmy.world to Lemmy Be Wholesome@lemmy.world · 8 months agoIn retaliation to the Pit bull haters,lemmy.worldimagemessage-square98fedilinkarrow-up117arrow-down118file-text
arrow-up1-1arrow-down1imageIn retaliation to the Pit bull haters,lemmy.worldDr. Coomer@lemmy.world to Lemmy Be Wholesome@lemmy.world · 8 months agomessage-square98fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareWamGams@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down6·8 months agoYour data was true 13-15 years ago, doesn’t mean it is true today.
minus-squareNoite_Etion@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·8 months agoDoesn’t mean it’s wrong either; try to provide something to say otherwise. Also how old does data need to be before it’s dismissed as ‘too old’?
minus-squareWamGams@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down2·8 months agoThat’s up to you. What other subjects do you accept almost 20 year old data on? Do you go back 50 years? What is the cut off for you in all subjects, or is pit bulls the only subject you don’t have a standard for?
minus-squareBlack_Gulaman@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·7 months agodid pitbull behavior change in 20 years. they suddenly became goody good dogs? i’d say it’s relevant until today and well into the future.
Your data was true 13-15 years ago, doesn’t mean it is true today.
Doesn’t mean it’s wrong either; try to provide something to say otherwise.
Also how old does data need to be before it’s dismissed as ‘too old’?
That’s up to you.
What other subjects do you accept almost 20 year old data on? Do you go back 50 years? What is the cut off for you in all subjects, or is pit bulls the only subject you don’t have a standard for?
did pitbull behavior change in 20 years. they suddenly became goody good dogs?
i’d say it’s relevant until today and well into the future.