Almost 90 bombs were dropped in one region in just 24 hours.

Russia unleashed an unprecedented bombardment in southern Ukraine overnight in what local officials described as a “massive attack” in the conflict which has continued to rage even as the international community’s attention has moved to the war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza.

The Ukrainian Internal Affairs Ministry on Monday morning said Russia dropped at least “87 aerial bombs on populated areas of the Kherson region - the largest number for all time.” At least eight people were also injured in other Russian strikes carried out in the Odessa region further to the west on Sunday night.

  • Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Israel brought the terror on themselves. They are literally committing genocide.

    Also, Russia is fighting to maintain it’s black sea port, which NATO interfered with. That territory has always been Russian, and only US propaganda claims otherwise. Want proof? Go look at the board games Diplomacy and Axis and Allies, based on WW1/2 respectively. Both show Crimea as Russia. Or just look at Wikipedia, for this and other easily verifiable facts.

    • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Board games as proof? Crimea was part of the USSR sure ,but it was transferred to Ukraine so it’s no longer part of Russia, nothing to do with Nato, Russia wants to expand and they should get fucked.

      • Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Did Russia agree to the transfer to Ukraine? And regardless, that’s clearly not expansion, it’s reclaiming lost territory.

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Russia never owned those territories.

          That was the USSR, which does not exist anymore.

          Russia has no claim to Ukraine, no matter what their propaganda says.

          Otherwise Italy should own most of Europe and Africa, since the Roman empire did.

          And by your logic, Russia should be confined to the territories of Khanate of Kazan as conquered by Ivan the Terrible.

          • Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Russia is the same country as the USSR, minus the parts that left. They are a global superpower, like it or not they get a say in what happens globally. And the idea that a critically important part of a superpower can just be convinced to leave it is insane. What did America do when a large portion of our country (one which also contained all of our access to our southern waters, btw) tried to secede? We went to war with them. Russia is doing the same. Why is it wrong when they do it?

        • T00l_shed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          No because it was the USSR and they initiated the transfer, it absolutely is expansion since its not their territory. Reclaiming lost territory is such a terrible way to try and rationalize what Russia is doing. Unreal…

    • teichflamme@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      If you go back further you had the Kyiv Rus there and it was Ukrainian plus parts of Russia were too.

        • teichflamme@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The main part of it was on the part that is Ukrainian today, which is why the name is derived from Kyiv.

          It was a multi ethnic state though. Russians of course wouldn’t agree, but they are not exactly a reasonable voice on such things.

      • Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, I mean there’s a reason the region became the USSR for a while, it’s all very interwoven histories. There were times Ukraine was part of Russia, there were times Ukraine wasnt Russia but Crimea was, etc. The important thing is that Russia is clearly entitled to the area that has always been Russian, in some form or another.

        • teichflamme@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The reason the region became the USSR was Russian imperialism and military power.

          important thing is that Russia is clearly entitled to the area that has always been Russian, in some form or another.

          That’s not at all it. If anything Ukraine has not only the better claim to Crimea but also to some of the western parts of Russia than Russia itself.

          Historically speaking.

          • Thief_of_Crows@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Well, yes, but nobody is arguing America needs to surrender Hawaii or Alaska (or all of the other 48 states, tbh), even though they were both acquired via imperialism, and more recently than Crimea was. The fact is that Russia, just like America with Alaska/Hawaii, is capable of enforcing it’s ownership claim of the region, and it’s really not that unreasonable a demand to be making that the rest of the world consent to their ownership of it. It’s just the price of peace. America is simply trying to stifle their trade potential by proclaiming that Ukraine, who is not remotely close to a threat to American power, is the legit owner of a highly powerful port.